That
Judaism
is more a
religion of deed than of creed is best illustrated in the present time by
the life of the Russian Jew. Religion with him is co-extensive with life,
it regulates every detail of his daily existence and is so interwoven with
every movement and action of his being that he never stops to question its
authority. Even those who by contact with other civilizations and with
other forces have
changed
their opinions about many of
the sources and reasons of Jewish observances, are reluctant to abolish
these observances from their daily life, so strong is communal opinion and
so ingrained have these customs become in the very being of the Jew. The
communities are organised in accordance with these customs, the whole
social fabric in the Pale of Settlement is dependent upon these habits and
ceremonies, the dignity and position of the members of the community are
measured by their adherence to these laws and ordinances. So that, whereas
we frequently meet with Jews in the smallest
towns of the Pale who
entertain the most unorthodox views, there are few, indeed, who would dare
to indulge in unorthodox observances. The custom and habit of many
centuries have not only surrounded all truly religious observances with
halo of inviolable sanctity, but have also stamped many other actions--accretions from without--that have nothing to do with Judaism, with the
religious sanction. For example, it took many years of heated discussion
and disquiet before the Russian
Jew became reconciled to the idea that
the wearing of a short coat is not in conflict
with Judaism,
or that sitting bareheaded in one's house is not necessarily an
indication of religious laxity. In fact, there are hundreds of Jewish
communities even now in
Russia, the members of which are horrifed to see
one of their brethren dressed in accordance with European fashion. It is
the reverence for precedent and tradition which in the minds of the
Russian Jew led to the inclusion of many such outward details that have
apparently no bearing on religion.
W hat
a tremendous shock all these news and
opinions receive when the same Russian
Jew enters this land of personal liberty and
unrestrained individualism.
A complete stranger to the
public, the force of its opinion dwindles into insignificance so far as
he
is concerned. Coming in most cases with the intention of improving his
economic condition, he is soon confronted with the awful problem of
Sabbath observance. His veneration for the old observances having been
shaken, his opinions about the sacredness of the institutions of
society, as they exist in the old world having been changed when he first
viewed the statue of liberty and received the explanation of its
significance, and later when he listened to the first stump orator or read
the first newspaper that came his way, it was easy to submit to the
custom of the land, which to his mind, became identical with breaking away
from all that was regarded as sacred and inviolable in his native
province. The power of discrimination and acute analysis is not the common
property of the multitude. The majority of men are unable to distinguish
between the essential and the non-essential, and the average
Russian
Jew is no exception to this rule. With one sweep of the hand he changed
his notions about religion and religious observance, together with his
ideas about politics and government. Many a young man, who was firm in
his religious convictions, while in his native village, who having heard
of the religious laxity prevalent in America, had fully made up his mind
not to be misled by the temptation and
allurements of the free country, succumbed in his struggle and
renounced his Judaism when first submitting his
chin to the barber's razor1
at the entreaties and persuasions of his Americanized friends
and
relatives. Religion then appeared to
him not only distinct from life but antagonistic
to it, and since it was
life, a free, full, undisturbed life that he sought in coming here, he
felt compelled--and gradually habit and example made the compulsion
agreeable--to divorce himself from all the religious ties that had hitherto
encompassed him. Thus it is that the immigrant Jewish youth, not only
those who had embraced other teachings and theories before their arrival
in America, not only those who had cast their lot with the Russian
martyrs for liberty in their native land, but even the simple,
unsophisticated young men or women who had
been faithful and loyal to the
institutions of old and who desired to conduct their lives in accordance
with the precepts of their religion, became estranged from
Judaism
and
suffered themselves to be carried along by the tide, without offering
any struggle for the
maintenance of their cherished ideals. The old had
become impracticable, had interfered with their pursuits and desires, and
they were not strong enough,
morally or intellectually, to select the
good and the essential, and harmonize them with the new life into which
they had been forced. Thus it is that the immigrant Jew in America has
frequently become callous and indifferent, and sometimes cynical and
antagonistic, to everything pertaining to Judaism.
Although the great bulk
of early Jewish immigrants to America consisted of young people, it was
not very long before their elders, their fathers
and mothers, were invited to settle here. After
one member of the family had accumulated some wealth, and
established himself in bisiness, he was anxious that the other members
should be provided for, and when two or three brothers and sisters had
settled here, it was natural that they should desire to have their parents
with them. It is comparatively easy for a young man,
especially one who
is confronted with the disagreeable duty of serving for four
years in
the army without any prospect of advancement, to renounce all ties and
leave the place of his birth, but it becomes an entirely
different matter
when older people, who have spent most of their lives in one place, are
asked to sever all connections and begin life over again under new
conditions. There are also the troubles of the journey, the passage of the
boundary line, the great sea voyage, all of which appear insurmountable to
the old, inexperienced villager of the Pale. Still, the love for their
children, and the desire to be with them, in most
cases enabled the
parents to overcome all these difficulties and fears, and they safely
arrived in the "free country," were lovingly received by their children
and established in the new home provided for them. The old mother
immediately assumes the duties of the household, and her husband, after a
few days of sightseeing, is either initiated into
some easy labor, or is left alone to spend his time as he sees fit, his
support being provided for by his children. Glad as they are of the fine
appearance of their children, of their
modern ways and their business
successes, they cannot suppress a sigh at beholding
their shaved
chins at seeing them eat their breakfast
without having put on their phylacteries, prayed, washed their hands and
pronounced the blessings before and after the meals--customs
which they held sacred and
inviolable. Their religious
sentiments are constantly outraged
by
the actions
of their children,
and their cup of sadness and disappointment is filled to overflowing,
when, on the first Sabbath they behold their children depart for their
daily occupations. Who can measure the misery and wretchedness of the
parents, strangers in a strange land, at seeing that which they regarded
as dearer than life violated, voluntarily, by their own children?
Many a
father spent his first Sabbath in America in weeping and lamentation, many
a mother turned hers into a day of mourning, a real Tisha B'ab (the ninth
day of the month of Ab, the anniversary of the destruction of Jerusalem;
the Jewish memorial day of mourning). They could not command as they would
have done in their old home, for they are dependent upon their children.
They cannot argue, for their arguments are met either with ridicule or
with explanations of inexorable, unanswerable
problems of economy which they do not understand.
They can only silently weep at their misfortune
and regret the day that they set foot in this "trefa medinah," this
unclean land. In course of time, however, they become reconciled to
conditions and though they themselves still adhere to the old customs and
institutions of their religion, they regard as natural that the younger
generation should disregard religious precepts and ceremonies. Some have
engaged in business themselves and learned by experience the many
temptations and allurements which constantly beset the way of the
young
and to which even some of the older people succumb. The old Jewess may
still curse Columbus for his great transgression in discovering America,
where her children have lost their religion, the old father may still
relieve his burdened heart on the high holy days by reciting the
confession of sins, but in the course of the year, they are either too
much engrossed in other affairs
or they become too much accustomed to religious violations to utter words
of censure
or regret. Thus the young go their way unmolested by the importunities of
their parents. The old go theirs also.
They
organize synagogues and try to introduce here all the
provincialisms
and crudities to which they were accustomed in the small
villages of Russia or Galicia whence they came. At home, some of the young
men or women, whose
regard for their
parents' sensibllities is greater than for their own convenience,
perfunctorily observe the minutiae of religion, whilst others disregard
them even when in the presence of their elders. Among the enthusiastic
Russian Jewish youth there may also be found some, who, ensnared
in the meshes of nihilism
or socialism, as they understand the terms, consider
it their duty to make converts to their new faith, and begin their
missionary labors at home, thus embittering the lives of their parents by
senseless
and vexatious disputes. But these are in the minority; most of
the young people are entirely indiiferent and callous to their religion;
they follow the smallest details of religious observance in the presence
of their parents out of respect for them and disregard the most elemental
institutions of Judaism
when away from their homes. In neither case does
there exist a genuine sympathy between the young and the old. The
religious activities of the early
Russian
Jewish settlers were
therefore entirely one-sided, made to
harmonize
with the needs and the
habits of the older people. The generous, young, Americanized Jews
permitted their parents to introduce the old ways into the new land. Even
when they contributed toward the support of the synagogue, they did so
not out of the sense of supporting an institution that was needed, but to
indulge the old people in their whims and follies. They did not attempt to
gain control of these institutions, for they did not want them. Tbe
institutions have therefore become counterparts of similar
ones in the small villages of
Russia, wanting, however, the features which make the
latter influences for good in the
community. The congregations are
sometimes characterized by a spirit of
commercialism, not at
all
in
harmony with the cause they represent and lacking the essential characteristics of a congregation by failing to unite the various elements
into one body or to inspire them with broad religious feeling.
|
|
When
Russian
Jews first came in large numbers to Philadelphia most of
the Jewish congregations in the city had already introduced reforms in
their services. Religious scruples, social differences, and a spirit of
clannishness that is natural to foreigners caused the
Russian
Jews to form synagogues of their own. The only orthodox synagogue where
the services were conducted in strict accordance with tradition was the
Portuguese Synagogue Mickvé
Israel, but there the social distinction was still greater and the difference in the pronunciation of
the Hebrew and in the ritual made the service
almost unintelligible to the Russian Jewish immigrant.
The German Jewish population had at that
time moved to the upper sections of the city, whereas the Russian
immigrants settled mainly in the district south of Spruce Street, so that
distance combined with other causes
to force the newly arrived immigrants
to organize congregations of their own in the districts where they lived.
Already before the general exodus from Russia in the early eighties there
was a small Jewish community in Port Richmond, in the northeastern
section of the city, which maintained its own synagogue. But, as it
appears, the later arrivals preferred to remain in
the southern section, and in the course
of but a few years a flourishing Jewish community with synagogues
and other religious institutions was established in the district
bounded by Spruce Street on the north, Washington Avenue on the
south, Broad Street on the west, and the Delaware River on the east.
photo:
Mickvé Israel Synagogue, Philadelphia, 1905 |
The
two
largest synagogues belonging to the congregations B 'nai Abraham
Anshe
Russia (organized in 1882) and Kesher
Israel (formerly B 'nai Jacob, organized in 1883), are situated on
Lombard Street, the first on the north side above Fifth, the second on the
south side above Fourth Street.
These, however, were not the first congregations organized by the Russian
Jewish immigrants, nor were they the only
ones. In many cases the founding of a congregation proceeded
along the following lines: A few individuals, usually
such as came from the same
town or district, feeling the necessity of some concerted action, banded
themselves together to form a beneficial society ordinarily bearing the
name of the town or district whence most of the members came. The aim of
such societies, in the first instance, was to assist financially any of the
members
who might be sick, to provide burial for the dead, and a death
benefit for the widow or orphan of a deceased member. After the society
became strengthened in numbers, a hall was hired for meeting purposes and
was converted into a praying room. Witll the approach of the high holy
days, a season when
every Jew feels the need of a synagogue, a reader
was engaged and seats sold to members or non-members. This brought
a
considerable revenue to the society and after a few years,
in many cases, the organizations saved enough money
to begin negotiations for a synagogue building.
Jews evinced no scruples in regard to turning a
church into a Jewish synapgue, and since the neighborhood was
becoming more and more Jewish, the Christians gradually moving to other
parts of the city, a church building was easily obtainable. In fact, most
of the Jewish synagogues in Philadelphia were formerly Christian churches.
The building was bought and altered for purposes of Jewish worship and the
society imperceptibly turned into a congregation, retaining, however, for
a long period, its beneficial elements. In this manner most of the
Russian Jewish synagogues were formed. The distinction
between a chevra
and a congregation consists in the fact that the former has no special
building for religious worship, whereas the latter has. We frequently
meet with two or more chevras worshiping in the same building on various
lloors, either because they are unwilling to unite and buy a building of
their own or because,
as is often the case, even
when united they are unable to procure sutIleient funds for a building.
As
might be expected, these chevras
conduct their
services in many
cases
in an undignified manner, the officers
being
interested in the money they expect to
realize
from the service rather than in the religious and
moral improvement of the worshipers.
The position of the rabbi in the
Russian Jewish community is peculiar. In
Russia the rabbi is,
as a rule,
not connected with any particular congregation but is regarded
as the ecclesiastical head of all the Jews. In larger communities he is
given one or more assistants (dayyanim-judges)
who help him in the administration of justice, which is still one of the
functions of the Russian rabbi, or in the decision
of ritual cases. Some congregations may select for
themselves preachers (maggidim) who interpret legal
or homiletic works to large gatherings, every day
at dusk, between the afternoon and evening services, and deliver religious
discourses on Saturday afternoons. The rabbi, however, is looked upon as
the chief of the community. He rarely preaches, he sometimes visits the
constituent synagogues, and on the Sabbath
preceding Passover and on the penitential Sabbath (between New
Year and the Day of Atonement) delivers learned discourses at the largest
synagogue in town, to which all are invited. The majority of the people
rarely come in contact with the rabbi; his greatness is measured not by
his work among them, but by his knowledge of Jewish lore and by
his assiduity in study;
his position is of the highest dignity and honor.
It is entirely
different
with the rabbi
in this country, on
account of the diverse elements of nationality and
religious proclivities, no one rabbi is satisfactory
to all the members of the community. Where the institution of chief rabbi
was tried it invariably failed for this reason. The individual
congregations were either unable or unwilling to engage the services of a
rabbi and many of them even dispensed with a hired reader, since almost
every Jew is able and anxious to read the services. The lay
officers conduct
all the
affairs of the congregation, the spiritual needs of the
older people are attended to by themselves or by one ot their number more
learned than the rest, reading and interpreting portions of
the rabbinic literature in the room adjoining the synagogue. The
children are taught Hebrew and religion at their homes or at the
established religious schools. The young people of older growth do not
visit the synagogue and do
not care for religious instruction, so that
the services of a rabbi are regarded by them as superfluous. Still, with
the, increase of the population and the more perfect organization of the
community, the need of a communal leader became
obvious and some congregations have elected a rabbi. To import a rabbi from Russia and
ensure him a respectable livelihood was beyond the ability of any single
body, and the union of a few congregations in the election of a rabbi,
although attempted in a few instances could not succeed because of the
diverse elements and
different tendencies of each congregation. So that
those congregations which desired a rabbi had to satisfy themselves
with the material at hand and select from their midst
a
learned man,
authorized to decide religious questions, and to undertake the control of
their spiritual affairs. The salary offered is usually very small, but
many perquisites fall to the share of the rabbi. These consist of wedding
fees, fees for the supervision of the ritual slaughter of animals, fees
for the supervision of the ritual preparation of various articles of
food or the Passover, and of occasional presents by wealthy members. In
retum the rabbi is expected to preach occasionally in the synagogue and
to answer questions of law and of ritual. It will be noticed from his
various duties and privileges here enumerated that the
relation between rabbi and congregation is not close, not one of thorough sympathy and
mutual understanding. The rabbi is still the rabbi of the community, not
of an organized community, but one of individuals. Congregations frequently permit their rabbi to be
elected by
congregations
also, without there being any union.....and, on the
other hand, many so-called rabbis aris....not
connected with any congregation, but, being
s....
by a few individuals, exercise the functions in
....
district. There are always, however,
two or three, who by virtue of their activity and tact, succeed in making
themselves nominally at least the heads of the community, and in causing
the people to respect their opinions on communal questions. In
Philadelphia, Rev. B. L. Levinthal, the rabbi of the B'nai Abraham
Congregation since 1891, and subsequently elected by a few other
congregations, is recognized as the chief of the Russian
rabbinate, while Rev. A. H. Ershler, of the Ahavas Achim
Anshe Shavil
Congregation, and Rev. Nathan Brenner, of the B'nai Israel Congregation
of Port Richmond, are also recognized authorities in
Jewish law and
identified with a number of communal movements. Besides these, there are
a number of other rabbis, some connected with congregations, others
deriving a livelihood from occasional fees--frequently given in an
unbecoming manner. The evil of this system, however, is being recognized
by the Russian Jews as well as by their rabbis, and the Union of Orthodox
Rabbis, a national organization established a few years ago, has made many
attempts to regulate the rabbinate, but so far with very little success.
There are three
classes of educational
institutions in a Jewish community of Russia, the cheder, the Talmud
Torah, and the yeshibah. The first is usually a private venture conducted
by an individual who receives a stipulated sum per semester for every
child he instructs. The instruction continues for the whole day and the
subjects included in the curriculum extend over the entire range of
elementary Jewish education, from the Hebrew alphabet to the study of the
Talmud and its commentaries. Religion per se, or Jewish history is rarely
taught in the cheder, the pupil being expected to derive his knowledge of
these subjects from his study of the Bible and the Talmud. The Talmud
Torah is a public institution maintained by the community for givmg
instruction free of charge to the children of the poor. It is like the
cheder except that it is less modern in its methods. The yeshiba--is a
higher institution of learning where the Talmud and subsequent rabbinic
literature only are studied, under the guidance of a rosh yeshibah (chief
of the academy). This is usually a public institution and is maintained by
contributions from various communities and in a
few instances from the whole Jewish body, and even Jews outside of
Russia.
In the yeshiba the instruction imparted by the teacher is of very little
importance. The greatest
stress
is laid on individual
study and research. The Russian government,
true to its policy of preventing
assemblies of young people, no matter
what the object, looks with suspicion upon these academies, and
in 1892 closed the doors of the oldest and most famous, the
Yeshibah of Volosin, the pride of the Russian Jews.
Still many of greater
or lesser reputation, depending entirely on the erudition of their
chiefs, still exist in Russia,
where the growing youth devote their years
to the mastery
of the intricate literature of the
rabbis. There is one characteristic feature in all
Jewish educational institution in Russia,-- they are
consciously or unconsciously kept distinct fro the synagogues.
The American public school
system, under which every child is expected to spend the greater part
of the day in secular studies, prevented the earlier settlers from
introducing the educational methods to which they were accustomed.
The problem was partly solved for them by the Hebrew Sunday schools
which had been in existence in Philadelphia
many years before the Russian Jewish exodus. The Hebrew Sunday School Society and the
Hebrew Education Society immediately took steps toward meeting the
increasing demands of the growing community and established school
in the sections where the settlement was most dense. But these schools,
though largely patronized by children of Russian Jews, were not
considered sufficient by their parents, either because Hebrew was
not regarded as of priml importance in the curriculum, or because the
moden methods employed in these schools were looked upon by them with
suspicion. Hence the cheder was introduced here, of course in a
greatly modified form. The most common custom is to have the teacher
come to the pupil's house after school hours every day and instruct
him in the rudiments of Hebrew, especially that
which is used in public
worship. These teachers receive a very moderate compensation. They
are frequently altogether unacquainted witl pedagogic principles. The
more advanced teachers, after some struggle and privation, succeeded
in obtaining a
patronage large enough to warrant their
opening a school
for the afternoon hours, where Hebrew is the chief
and frequently the only subject of
instruction. That these private religious schools are productive of
so little good
is due to various
causes of which but a few will be mentioned here. The
teacher or rabbi, if he is experienced in teaching, which is not always
the case, is usually of foreign birth and training and has very little
sympathy with the wants and desires of the American child and no
understanding of his tricks and subtleties. The language used in
instruction is in most cases Yiddish, a language that is foreign to the
pupil even though he use it in conversation at home. The rewards and
punishments
in use in these schools are obnoxious to a child acquainted with the more
refined methods of the public schools. The system with which these
teachers are acquainted is the old system of the cheder under which the
child was expected to devote the whole day to Jewish subjects, and it is
very difficult for them to adapt themselves to new conditions. If there is
lack of sympathy and understanding between the immigrant father and the
American trained child, there is open hostility between the rabbi of the
cheder and his pupils. These and other causes militate against the cheder.
The need of providing instruction for
the children of the poor was made obvious to the leaders among the
Russian Jews, and a free
school (Talmud Torah) was established in 1890, where religious instruction
is given free of charge or for a small fee, to the children of the poor.
In course of time, when the Jews began to move up-town, another school was
established there, and recently a third has been organized in the far
southern section. These schools are attended altogether by about 1,000
children and are supported by a regular membership and by voluntary
contributions. Sessions are held every day of the week, including
Saturdays and Sundays, and the method of instruction diirers very little
from that pursued in the cheder. During the past year, in accordance with
a resolution passed by the Union of Orthodox Rabbis, a Hebrew high school
(later, Yeshibah
Mishkan
Israel) was organized by Rabbi
Levinthal, where instruction in Talmud and in the higher branches of
Jewish lore are imparted to boys of advanced age, with the view to
preparing them for the rabbinate. Judgment must be reserved on this new
venture until a later time. Some congregations have attempted to organize
schools in connection with their synagogues, and in a few instances this
has proved highly successful. It should be added that
in almost all these institutions
only boys are admitted, the girls being left entirely without any
religious
instruction or receiving it at home or in the Hebrew Sunday
School Society's
classes.
A few attempts have been made to
organize the young people for religious purposes, but these have
invariably failed. The numerous societies of young people in the southern
section of the city make little or no provision for religious education,
their endeavors being mainly along social and literary lines. The Hebrew
Literature Society is the oldest and strongest of the kind down-town.
Its former radical tendency is gradually disappearing and lectures on
strictly Jewish subjects are listened to with attention in its halls; but
it has not yet taken a positive stand in religious matters. The Young
Men's
Hebrew Union's
activities are
social and broadly educational. There
are other societies composed of young people whieh make no pretence, even
in name, to any religious activity. The Zionist societies, however, though
not aiming directly at religious improvement, exert
a
decidedly good influence on their constituencies. Lectures on Jewish
subjects are the role in these organizations and classes for instruction
in Jewish history and Hebrew meet with some success among them. Since the
establishment of the Zion Institute in 1902, a building especially
devoted to Zionistic purposes, the activity in these lines has increased.
There is a library and reading room, where a majority of the books and
periodicals are in Hebrew. Recently a decorous service for the high holy
days was instituted. The Zionist ideal, which presupposes a strong
national Jewish consciousness among its devotees, cannot but be productive
of stronger religious sentiments, of a more virile interest in Israel's
past.
An attempt was made a few years ago to
organize a reform synagogue down-town for those to whom the service in the
existing synagogues had become distasteful. Friday evening services were
held in a hall, in accordance with the reform mode of worship and an
English sermon was delivered by one of the up-town reform rabbis. But the
attempt failed for many reasons, the most prominent being the lack of
interest on the part of the down-town Jews. After a short existence, the
congregation was dissolved. Another attempt to organize the young people
in a religious body was made under the name of the Jewish Endeavor
Society, modeled after the New York society of
the same name. With the financial aid of the Council of Jewish Women,
this society arranged for Saturday afternoon services at one of the
largest synagogues down-town, with attractive singing and an English
sermon. The services were conducted in strictly orthodox style but were
made decorous and attractive. This also failed and its failure may be
ascribed to lack of interest in religious matters on the part of the young
people. Aa the result of a suggestion made by Rev. Dr. Joseph Krauskopf,
president of the Central Conference of American Rabbis, at its convention
in St. Louis during the summer of 1904, more active propaganda were made
in the lower section of the city for the establishment of a reform
congregation. The Union of American Hebrew Congregations sent its
representative, Rabbi George Zepin, to organize the movement. He succeeded
in interesting some downtown Jews in the movement and an organization was
effected under the name of Congregation Israel. Down-town orthodox rabbis
and laymen viewed the movement with alarm, and a circular advising
parents not to permit their children to attend the services was
distributed broadcast in the down-town districts. During the high holy
days the attendance was quite large. It remains, however, to be seen
whether this movement will meet with greater success than those that
preceded it.
To obtain a glimpse of the future
religious status of the
Russian Jews now living in Philadelphia, it is
necessary to consider the elements making up that body. It is quite
evident that from the older immigrants who arrived in this country with
settled habits and ideas very little can be expected.. They will continue
to live in the same manner
as they were accustomed to and
observe the ceremonies that have become part of their lives. Such as have
become estranged from religion are too few and their influence too
insignificant
to demand particular attention. The hope of Judaism in
America rests with the young people and especially with those of the
Russian immigrant cIass, both because of their numbers and increasing
inftuence and of their superior intellectual
attainments. It is these
young people that demand our especial consideration if we venture a
forecast of the future of
Judaism in this or any other part of the land.
Broadly speaking, we may divide the
young people of down-town Jewry into three classes. Such a division is not comprehensive, but it
will
be sufficient to give an insight into present conditions and will permit of conjecture as to the
future.
First. The young people that
hail from the lower class of Russian Jewish society who have never had the
advantages of culture or education of any kind. These, on arriving,
constitute in America the great army of sweatshop workers and soon become
the playthings of every unscrupulous demagogue. Oppressed by their
employer who, in most cases, belong to the same social class, they rebel,
and in their ignorance confuse economic and religious problems and
misinterpret the new theories of social economy presented to them by the
labor leaders. They become not only indifferent to religion but also
actuated by a hatred toward everything that has a
religious flavor. Their leaders are mostly disappointed Russian students,
banished political offenders, or such other persons as
have become embittered by the state of affairs in Russia
and who carry their dissatisfaction with the political status in
that land
into the realms of economy and religion. They
find ready listeners in the
group of wretched, overworked, and underfed laborers, who are glad to
flnd sympathy among the learned and who become willing disciples of all
their theories.
Second. The young people who come from
the middle classes of Russian Jewish society, who have had opportunities
for some refinement at home and some education at the cheder and other
institutions of
Jewish learning and have acquired some modern education through private
instruction. These, on coming to America, either become petty tradesmen,
store-keepers, or, if they are suceessful in obtaining some support at
the beginning, enter a professiona school and are graduated as lawyers or
physicians, the two favorite professions among Russian Jews in America. Th
peddlers who sell on the installment plan, or the shopkeepers, though
many of them possess a good knowledge of Judaism and of Jewish history,
and are especially attracted by the Zionist movement, having been compelled
at first to abandon many religious customs and
institutions, become careless
about religion and indiiferent to its behests. The professional men also
forsake religious practices either because they have become convinced
atheists or agnostics
or
because it pays them better to stand aloof
from the
synagogue. It is an old paradox
that Jews
have greater respect for him who stands at
a
distance from them in
religious matters than for one who takes a most active part in the
synagogue.
Third. The young people who
were born in this country or were brought here in childhood and have had
the advantages of a public school training. These should be the chief
concern of the communal
worker, for on them the future of Judaism mainly depends.
Their religious education is defective and their religious
observances, if they do observe anything in deference to their parents,
lacks spirit and interest. Most of them are not antagonistic to religion,
but are indifferent
to it, and wholesome influences may have a
salutary
effect upon their religious attitude. They are unsympathetic with the
existing synagogues because the synagogue offers them very little, it
being entirely managed and directed by the older people, who do not and
cannot understand them. They are indifferent to Jewish practice because
it has never been presented to them in a light that would appeal to their
more modern and more cultured tastes. If synagogues were established
exclusively for these young people and their management directed toward
the needs of this rising generation, they could yet be won over to a
staunch Judaism. The time is probably as yet unripe for such work, but it
is not very far distant. Modem synagogues, presided over by trained
American rabbis, will eventually be introduced in the Russian Jewish sections
of our large cities, and a more perfect and homogeneous religious body
will be formed in American Israel.
1
Shaving
is prohibited
according to ancient Jewish law.
Leviticus, xix.,27; xxi,
5. Comp. Talmud, Makkoth,
20a et seq
|