First published by
the American Jewish Committee
in their "American
Jewish Year Book,"
Volume 8 (1906-1907)
The subjoined table of the outrages
perpetrated upon the Jews of Russia, from Kishineff in 1903 to
Bialystok in 1906, is far from complete. This statement is not set
down to ward off criticism, but rather to invite additions and
corrections, and open the way for an accurate record useful to the
statesman and moralist of the present and to the historian and
moralist of the future. Even with its supplementary list of pogrom
towns and villages whose names have reached us mutilated beyond
recognition, like the victims within their own confines, the table
is not much more than a hint at dark things, which have escaped
observation and record by a nation in pain or the witness of pain.
"Many Jews killed and wounded" is neither statistics nor history;
nevertheless it tells a gruesome story. Towns to the number of 284
are recorded here as the scene of assaults of the peculiar kind
known as pogromy. In the United States alone, 832 places
responded to the appeal in behalf of recent suffering in Russia. Who
will say that the million and a quarter of money contributed by the
latter covers even the estimated loss of property in the former, let
alone the actual loss and the loss in potentialities?
The need of gathering
up all available stray notices in contemporary newspapers is the
more imperative, as it cannot be said of this phase of Jewish
history, "Behold, is it not written in the book of the chronicles of
the kings of Russia?" Or, if it be there written, those chronicles
are as surely lost to the contemporaries of the kings of Russia, as
the old chronicles of the kings of Israel and Judah are the
remote descendants of the latter. And the historiographers of the
Duma had no sooner written down the single chapter "Bialystok,"
letting "the world know that the pogroms were not the work of the
Russian nation, but of the so-called Government of Russia, than
that Government proved them right by silencing them and the Duma.
If the record herewith
presented is incomplete in numbers, dates, and circumstances that
lend themselves to tabulation, how far more imperfect is it as to
color, sound and all appertaining to the life and the death it
endeavors to bear witness to. The "terror by night," the "arrow that
flieth by day," and the "pestilence that walketh in darkness," the
"destruction that wasteth at noonday," these cannot be confined in
lists and columns. Nevertheless, a study of the table below reveals
at least two currents of life--one a current of shame and one
of glory. The reader who permits his glance to wander down the last
column cannot fail to note the tale of Governmental complicity as
plainly as in the Duma Commission Report, and at the same time the
tale of the revival of Jewish courage and manliness. The
exposure of the first and the further development of the second will
contribute to the triumph of Russian liberty and the attainment of
Jewish security. That these two causes may be better understood by
Jews and others in the United States justifies the appearance of the
table in the AMERICAN JEWISH YEAR BOOK.
A word of explanation
may be needed for the table and the lists accompanying it. The table
aims to contain, though in necessarily condensed form, the salient
information that appeared in the newspapers. It is bound to be
fallible beyond the high degree of fallibility inherent in such
compilations. For such a large part of the period covered, the
newspapers lay under the blighting ban of the censor. Besides, the
continued use of the Old Style Calendar by the Russians is a pitfall
in the way of the chronicler. Not only does he run the risk of
dating events alternately according to the two systems, but also he is in danger of repeating events reported according to the
one system in one source and the other system in another source.
Moreover, in a turbulent country like the Russia of to-day, it is
sometimes difficult to differentiate between an ordinary brawl or
strikers' excesses, in which anti-Semitic feeling plays only a
subordinate part, and an anti-Jewish riot of the distinctive pogrom
variety. The compiler can but console himself with the hope that the
imperfections of the table will stimulate some one with larger
opportunities for investigation to amend and complete it.
The first list, an
alphabetical arrangement of the towns mentioned in the table, is to
serve as a key to it. The second list contains additional names of
towns from which pogroms were reported in one or another source
unaccompanied by identifying data. The third list, of pogrom
Gubernias, is added for the sake of showing the relation of the
Jewish population to the whole, for which figures were not uniformly
available in the case of the towns.
Finally, the Report of
the Duma Commission on the pogrom at Bialystok, as published in the
London Jewish Chronicle of July 13,1906, has been appended as
a huge, illustrative footnote, an exhaustive commentary. It is the
only State document available on the subject of Jewish massacres in
Russia. Yet, in all but one particular, it covers the ground.
Substitute the names of streets and Jewish residents in Kishineff,
Gomel, Zhitomir, and Odessa, respectively, for those occurring in
the Report, and you have the history of these cities as well. The
only feature not set forth is the farcial(sp) trial likely to follow
upon Bialystok, as it followed upon Kishineff and the others. The
Report shows the corruptness of the Government through its agents
provocateurs, its hooligan hirelings, its soldiery, its police,
its high administrative officers, but a complete account of the
pogroms preceding Bialystok would show, in addition, that the
Russian aristocracy does not shrink back from tampering even with
the course of judicial inquiries. It orders penalties to be imposed
on the victims as well as the perpetrators of the
outrages--sometimes instead of them. A few of the guilty it
designates as official scapegoats, to bear slight terms of
imprisonment, from which a swift-following amnesty hastens to
release them. Civil damage suits it refuses to have the courts
entertain, and the advocates whom it assigns to the Jews, it
occasionally banishes to Siberia for doing their duty
conscientiously. There remains only to say, that the moderate
language of the Report conveys no notion of the revolting forms of
cruelty, the refinements of brutality described in the accounts of
eye-witnesses at Bialystok and elsewhere. As becomes a State
document of its kind, it eschews all those details which made it a
sickening task merely to gather the material for this table of
pogroms.
|
1: No.; 2.
Date; 3. Town; 4. Gubernia; 5. Population; 6. Jewish Pop.; 7.
Damage; 8. General Remarks |
1. |
2. |
3. |
4. |
5. |
6. |
7. |
|
8. |
|
1903 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
April 19 |
KISHINEFF |
Bessarabia |
147,962 |
50,000 |
47 Jews killed; 424 wounded; 700 houses burned; 600 shops
looted; 2,750 families affected; loss, 3,000,000 rubles. |
|
Agitation carried on systemically by Krushevan. Police deprive
Jews of sticks and disperse groups formed for resistance;
indicate houses to be attacked to the mob. Court refuses to
examine witnesses; replaces Jewish with Russian advocates;
penalties range from one month imprisonment to 4 years and 8
months penal servitude; prisoners released at once under an
amnesty act; suits for civil damages rejected as unfounded; an
advocate exiled for 5 years. |
2 |
May ? |
Batsha |
Bessarabia |
|
|
1 woman killed; several houses burnt. |
|
Supplemental to the Kishineff riot. |
3 |
Sep. 10 |
Gomel |
Mohilev |
46,446 |
26,161 |
8 Jews killed; 100 injured; 400 families ruined; loss, 110,000
rubles. |
|
16 Christians acquitted; 13 Jews sentenced to 5 months, 10
days imprisonment and loss of civil rights; 12
Christians and 12 Jews to the same term without loss of civil
rights, etc. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1904 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
May 1 |
Bender |
Bessarabia |
31,851 |
12,000 |
5 Jews killed; large loss of property |
|
Mob disperses as soon as it hears the Governor's telegram ordering the Cossacks to fire. |
5 |
May 30 |
Khotin |
Bessarabia |
18,126 |
|
100 Jews wounded; principal synagogue demolished. |
|
|
6 |
Aug. 12 |
Parczev |
Siedlce |
5,500 |
|
20 Jews wounded; many shops and houses looted. |
|
Girl forcibly taken to a convent; court decides against the
father; this excites a riot against all the Jews. |
7 |
Aug. 18 |
Ostrovitz |
Radom |
9,253 |
|
20 Jews killed; 19 injured; many shops and houses looted and
demolished. |
|
Attack on the synagogue repulsed by Jews armed with axes,
sticks, and pieces of iron. |
8 |
Sep. 4 |
Alexandrovo |
Bessarabia |
|
|
|
|
Riot during mobilization of troops. |
9 |
Sep. 4 |
Kishineff |
Bessarabia |
147,962 |
50,000 |
|
|
Riot during mobilization of troops. |
10 |
Sep. 4 |
Lilvinovka |
Bessarabia |
|
|
|
|
Riot during mobilization of troops. |
11 |
Sep. 4 |
Ekaterinoslav |
Ekaterinoslav |
121,216 |
36,600 |
Many Jews beaten; shops looted; Christians mistaken for Jews
also suffer. |
|
Riot during mobilization of troops; police passive at first;
intervene at length, but mob grown too large to be suppressed. |
12 |
Sep. 4 |
Smiela |
Kiev |
15,000 |
10,000 |
100 houses burnt; 150 shops looted; 2 schools and 2
synagogues demolished; library of thousands of volumes totally
destroyed; loss, 400,000 rubles. |
|
The outrages perpetrated by the railway employees; the Jews
offer resistance; arrest of many of the mob. |
13 |
Sep. 4 |
Rovno |
Volhynia |
24,905 |
|
26 persons injured; many shops looted. |
|
Order restored by intervention of police commissary and a
detachment of the fire brigade. |
14 |
Sep. 11 |
Sosnoviec |
Petrikov |
12,000 |
|
8 Jews wounded; 6 shops looted;
windows smashed in 30 houses. |
|
The outrages committed by
workingmen; the Jews offer little resistance on account
of the New Year. Ten rioters arrested. |
15 |
Oct. 11 |
Knyazhitza |
Mohilev |
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
Oct. 20 |
Alexandria |
Kherson |
14,002 |
4,794 |
8 killed; 19 injured. |
|
|
17 |
Oct. 23 |
Kanev |
Kiev |
8,892 |
|
Many shops and houses
destroyed. |
|
The outrages committed by
reservists. |
18 |
Oct. 24 |
Vitebsk |
Vitebsk |
66,143 |
39,520 |
48 Jews injured. |
|
Riot during mobilization of
troops. |
19 |
Oct. 24 |
Mohilev |
Mohilev |
22,093 |
14,000 |
120 Jews injured. |
|
Riot during mobilization of
troops; foretold early in the month by chief of police, who at
the same time said no protection would be granted Jews.
Refuses aid when appealed to. |
20 |
Oct. 24 |
Gorki |
Mohilev |
6,730 |
|
69 shops looted and demolished;
loss 200,000 rubles. |
|
|
21 |
Oct. 26 |
Smolensk |
Smolensk |
46,899 |
4,650 |
|
|
|
22 |
Oct.26 |
Lyutsin |
Vitebsk |
3,929 |
|
|
|
|
23 |
Oct. 27 |
Amtchislav |
Mohilev |
|
|
|
|
The outrages committed by
reservists and the police. |
24 |
Oct. 27 |
Bykhova |
Mohilev |
6,536 |
3,172 |
Loss 200,000 rubles; all the
Jewish shops and stalls destroyed. |
|
The outrages committed by
reservists. |
25 |
Oct. ? |
Bunitchi |
Mohilev |
|
|
|
|
|
26 |
Oct. ? |
Sielzi |
Mohilev |
|
|
|
|
|
27 |
Oct. ? |
Sukhany |
Mohilev |
|
|
|
|
The outrages committed by
reservists. |
28 |
Oct. ? |
Tchausy |
Mohilev |
5,550 |
3,000 |
|
|
The outrages committed by
reservists. |
29 |
Oct. ? |
Tcherikov |
Mohilev |
5,250 |
|
|
|
The outrages committed by
reservists. |
30 |
Oct. 29 |
Balta |
Podolia |
23,393 |
18,480 |
|
|
The outrages committed by
reservists. |
31 |
Oct.31 |
Juravitch |
Mohilev |
|
|
26 shops looted and demolished. |
|
|
32 |
Nov. 2 |
Radomysl |
Kiev |
11,154 |
|
|
|
|
33 |
Nov. ? |
Boguslav |
Kiev |
12,000 |
10,000 |
Over 100 houses looted and
demolished; loss, 300,000 rubles. |
|
|
34 |
Nov. ? |
Stepenitz |
Kiev |
|
|
|
|
Riot during mobilization of
troops. |
35 |
Nov. ? |
Vilkomir |
Kovno |
13,509 |
|
|
|
|
36 |
Nov. 4 |
Dikovka |
Kherson |
|
|
All the Jewish shops looted and
demolished. |
|
|
37 |
Nov. 4 |
Ovidiopol |
Kherson |
5,296 |
360 |
11 Jews killed; 212 wounded; all
Jewish houses without exception looted and then burnt. |
|
|
38 |
Nov. 6 |
Samara |
Samara |
91,672 |
|
|
|
|
39 |
Nov. 16 |
Rakishek |
Kovno |
|
|
4 Jews wounded seriously; many
shops looted. |
|
|
40 |
Nov. 16 |
Slonim |
Grodno |
15,893 |
10,588 |
Many Jews killed and wounded;
many shops looted. |
|
The outrages committed by
reservists; the Jews defend themselves. |
41 |
Nov. 18 |
Ostrov |
Lomza |
11,264 |
|
3 Jews killed; 10 wounded; many
shops demolished. |
|
The outrages committed by
reservists. |
42 |
Nov. 21 |
Asor |
Grodno |
|
|
|
|
The riot suppressed by the
Self-Defense. |
43 |
Nov. 22 |
Elisabetgrad |
Kherson |
61,841 |
24,340 |
The windows of almost all
the Jewish houses smashed. |
|
The outrages committed by
reservists. |
44 |
Nov. 28 |
Troyanovka |
Volhynia |
|
|
The windows of almost all the
Jewish houses smashed. |
|
|
45 |
Dec. ? |
Czenstochova |
Petrikov |
45,130 |
12,000 |
|
|
|
46 |
Dec. ? |
Novoradomsk |
Petrikov |
12,407 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1905 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47 |
Feb.15 |
Gomel |
Mohilev |
46,446 |
26,161 |
300 Jews wounded, many mortally;
1 killed. |
|
Police passive spectators. |
48 |
Feb.18 |
Dvinsk |
Vitebsk |
72,231 |
32,369 |
200 persons injured; whole
Jewish quarter destroyed. |
|
Self-defense paralyzed; rioters
bought off by Jewish shopkeepers. |
49 |
Feb. 21 |
Theodosia |
Crimea |
27,238 |
|
47 Jews killed; over 50 wounded. |
|
Strikers commit the outrages. |
50 |
Mar. 12 |
Minsk |
Minsk |
91,494 |
50,000 |
Many killed and wounded; 3
Jewish streets completely looted. |
|
Police passive for three days. |
51 |
April 2 |
Warsaw |
Warsaw |
750,000 |
250,000 |
4 Jews killed; over 40 wounded. |
|
Occurred in a locality in which
the Bund was conducting a demonstration for a dead leader. |
52 |
April ? |
Tchelyabinsk |
Orenburg |
19,891 |
|
16 houses looted and destroyed. |
|
The outrages committed by
soldiers and the mob. Notices circulated calling on the people
to attack the Jews. |
53 |
April 17 |
Vinnitza |
Podolia |
28,995 |
|
5 Jews and 5 soldiers killed;
the Jewish houses looted. |
|
Self-Defense band offers
resistance; soldiers join the mob; police and two companies of
military disperse the Jews and then loot and pillage. |
54 |
April 18 |
Melitopol |
Taurida |
15,120 |
|
|
|
|
55 |
April 23 |
Pavlikovka |
Zhitomir |
|
|
|
|
|
56 |
April 23 |
Podol |
Zhitomir |
|
|
|
|
|
57 |
April ? |
Bialystok |
Grodno |
63,927 |
48,552 |
Many Jews wounded; many
houses looted. |
|
Cossacks terrorize the Jewish
quarter. |
58 |
April 26 |
Dvinsk |
Vitebsk |
72,231 |
32,369 |
|
|
Jewish workmen disperse
the mob with sticks. |
59 |
April 27 |
Zdunskaya-Volya |
Kalish |
15,934 |
|
|
|
|
60 |
April 30 |
Dusyaty |
Kovno |
|
1,000 |
2 Jews killed; 50 wounded; 50
shops and 300 houses looted and burnt; loss, 100,000 rubles. |
|
The Jews offer resistance;
overpowered by numbers; appeal to Governor, who sends 15
Cossacks for their protection. |
61 |
May 3 |
Vladimir |
Volynia |
9,695 |
|
|
|
|
62 |
May 4 |
Melitopol |
Taurida |
15,120 |
|
25 Jews injured; 3 killed; 100
houses demolished; 45 shops burnt. |
|
Self-Defense efficient. Police
and troops enlist the aid of the hooligans on disarming the
Jews. |
63 |
May ? |
Novo-Alexandrovsk |
Kovno |
6,370 |
4,277 |
|
|
|
64 |
May 10 |
Gostynin |
Warsaw |
6,755 |
|
|
|
|
65 |
May 10 |
Dubovetz |
Zhitomir |
|
|
|
|
|
66 |
May 10 |
Tchudnov |
Zhitomir |
|
|
9 Jews killed. |
|
Victims killed by a mob while on
their way to join the Self-Defense in the town of
Zhitomir. |
67 |
May 11 |
Zhitomir |
Zhitomir |
65,422 |
42,062 |
29 Jews killed; 150 wounded; 25
shops looted; 5 houses burnt. |
|
Self-Defense so active that
number of Christians killed exceeds that of Jewish victims;
all the latter members of Self-Defense. Blinoff, a Christian
defender of the Jews, killed under the eyes of the police;
agitation against the Jews by Krushevan's paper; reports of
riot current as early as April 29. Police passive;
encourage murder. Hooligans prevented by Governor from
murdering the son of wealthy parents; all wealthy Jews immune.
Mayor participates in organizing rioters; Cossacks aid mob in
looting; Governor impassive; Jewish deputation received
coldly. Photographs of intended victims found with rioters. |
68 |
May 11 |
Rostov-on-Don |
District of the Don |
119,889 |
14,000 |
|
|
|
69 |
May 12 |
Kroshna |
Zhitomir |
|
|
Many killed and wounded; the
whole Jewish quarter looted. |
|
Riot so sudden, the Self-Defense
could not act. |
70 |
May 14 |
Kishineff |
Bessarabia |
147,962 |
50,000 |
|
|
|
71 |
May 14 |
Simferopol |
Taurida |
48,821 |
12,200 |
|
|
|
72 |
May 29 |
Rezhitza |
Vitebsk |
10,681 |
|
One Jewish house looted and
demolished. |
|
Outrages promptly stopped by the
Self-Defense; 4 of the Self-Defense arrested. |
73 |
May ? |
Troyanov |
Volhynia |
|
2,000 |
11 Jews killed. |
|
|
74 |
June 9 |
Minsk |
Minsk |
91,494 |
50,000 |
7 Jews wounded; many shops
demolished. |
|
Self-Defense prevents spread of
riot. |
75 |
June 16 |
Brest-Litovsk |
Grodno |
46,542 |
20,252 |
2 killed; 26 wounded. |
|
The Self-Defense effective,
especially by reason of the military uniform of the leader,
which awed the looting soldiers. |
76 |
June 20 |
Yuryevich |
Volhynia |
2,000 |
|
|
|
Self-Defense active. |
77 |
June 23 |
Tultshin |
Podolia |
11,500 |
|
|
|
Self-Defense active. |
78 |
June 30 |
Petrikov |
Petrikov |
30,400 |
|
2 Jews killed; 15 wounded. |
|
Soldiers commit the outrages. |
79 |
June ? |
Lodz |
Petrikov |
314,200 |
75,000 |
561 killed; 341 of them Jews; of
the 1,000 wounded, more than half Jews; 69 die in the
hospitals. |
|
Cause of riot, a strike. |
80 |
June ? |
Kutno |
Warsaw |
11,213 |
|
|
|
|
81 |
July 12 |
Bialystok |
Grodno |
63,927 |
48,552 |
10 Jews killed; 300 wounded. |
|
|
82 |
July 23 |
Kiev |
Kiev |
249,830 |
20,000 |
100 Jews killed, 406 wounded;
100 houses looted. |
|
|
83 |
July ? |
Makariev |
Nishni-Novgorod |
1,500 |
|
Many Jews wounded; many shops
and houses looted and destroyed. |
|
|
84 |
Aug. 3 |
Ekaterinoslav |
Ekaterinoslav |
121,216 |
36,600 |
Frightful massacre. |
|
Self-Defense active; more
hooligans killed and wounded than Jews. |
85 |
Aug. 6 |
Uman |
Kiev |
28,628 |
|
Many Jews wounded. |
|
Hooligans dispersed by the Jews,
aided by students of the Agricultural College. |
86 |
Aug. 13 |
Kertch |
Taurida |
28,982 |
2,650 |
Bloody riot. |
|
Self-Defense too small to be
active. |
87 |
Aug. 14 |
Berditchev |
Volhynia |
62,283 |
50,460 |
|
|
|
88 |
Aug. 14 |
Bialystok |
Grodno |
63,927 |
48,552 |
60 Jews killed; 200 wounded. |
|
|
89 |
Aug. 14 |
Bigla |
|
|
|
40 Jewish and 10 other houses
burnt; 400 Jews homeless. |
|
|
90 |
Aug.14 |
Gomel |
Mohilev |
46,446 |
26,161 |
|
|
|
91 |
Aug. 14 |
Pinsk |
Minsk |
28,000 |
18,000 |
|
|
|
92 |
Aug. ? |
Rishkahn |
Bessarabia |
|
|
Completely demolished. |
|
|
93 |
Aug. 15 |
Sirdi |
Bessarabia |
|
|
Many Jews killed; all the shops
of the Jewish quarter looted. |
|
The Jews offer resistance;
troops passive during a ten days' massacre. |
94 |
Sep. 1 |
Gomel |
Mohilev |
46,446 |
26,161 |
7 Jews killed; many wounded. |
|
Arrested hooligans soon
liberated by the manifesto of Oct. 30 |
95 |
Sep. ? |
Kertch |
Taurida |
28,982 |
2,650 |
6 Jews killed; 285 wounded; many
shops looted. |
|
Self-Defense active; routed by
soldiers. Town Council adopts resolutions of sympathy;
suppressed by the authorities. |
96 |
Sep. 4 |
Kishineff |
Bessarabia |
147,962 |
50,000 |
4 Jews killed; 80 wounded. |
|
Funeral procession attacked by
troops and the police. |
97 |
Sep. 30 |
Kursk |
Kursk |
52,896 |
|
|
|
|
98 |
Sep. 30 |
Ekaterinoslav |
Ekaterinoslav |
121,216 |
36,600 |
2 killed; 368 wounded. |
|
Mob encouraged and helped by the
police invade 3 synagogues on New Year's Day. |
99 |
Oct. 1 |
Arkhangelsk |
Arkhangelsk |
20,983 |
|
|
|
|
100 |
Oct. 1 |
Plotsk |
Plotsk |
556,877 |
50,473 |
7 Jews killed; many injured. |
|
|
101 |
Oct. 5 |
Dobrianka |
Tchernigov |
|
2,000 |
|
|
Self-Defense heroic. |
102 |
Oct. 19 |
Kursk |
Kursk |
52,896 |
|
|
|
|
103 |
Oct. 26 |
Bayramcha |
Bessarabia |
|
|
8 killed; 5 wounded; loss,
300,000 rubles. |
|
|
104 |
Oct. 30 |
Kursk |
Kursk |
52,896 |
|
|
|
The Cossacks plunder; police
nowhere to be found. |
105 |
Oct. 31 |
Odessa |
Kherson |
405,041 |
160,000 |
Over 800 persons killed; 5000
wounded; loss, 100,000,0000 rubles. In general, for the
November pogroms: 25,000 Jews killed; 100,000 injured;
200,000 Jewish families ruined; loss, 400,000,000 rubles. |
|
Self-Defense well-organized ad
heroic; whenever Jews had the upper hand, the police
surrounded them and shot them down; the Dvorniks (janitors)
ordered to point out Jewish flats to hooligans; Imperial
ukase published thanking troops in garrison for exemplary
conduct; 19 officers who prevented murder and pillage
transferred to obscure posts. Prefect of police Neidhardt
promote4d to be Governor of Nishni-Novgorod. In general, for
the November pogroms: prosecutors and coroners ordered to
conduct investigations so as to exculpate soldiers and
police; the Governors allowed to resign and then transferred
to other, usually better posts. |
106 |
Oct. 31 |
Kielce |
Kielce |
23,189 |
|
|
|
|
107 |
Oct. 31 |
Kherson |
Kherson |
96,219 |
25,000 |
Many Jews wounded; the petty
traders suffer. |
|
|
108 |
Oct. 31 |
Kiev |
Kiev |
249,830 |
20,000 |
60 killed; 369 wounded; 7,000
families suffer; 2,000 shops looted. |
|
Self-Defense heroic; almost
all the killed and wounded of the League. |
109 |
Oct. 31 |
Repka |
Tchernigov |
|
|
|
|
|
110 |
Oct. 31 |
Tchetchersk |
Mohilev |
|
|
50 shops and 60 houses looted
and demolished. |
|
|
111 |
Nov. 1 |
Vilna |
Vilna |
162,633 |
80,000 |
|
|
|
112 |
Nov. 1 |
Smolensk |
Smolensk |
46,899 |
4,576 |
|
|
|
113 |
Nov. 1 |
Vyazma |
Smolensk |
15,776 |
|
All the Jewish houses
plundered and destroyed. |
|
|
114 |
Nov. 1 |
Lomza |
Lomza |
25,075 |
9,822 |
|
|
|
115 |
Nov. 1 |
Lovitch |
Warsaw |
12,434 |
|
|
|
|
116 |
Nov. 1 |
Rubeshivka |
|
|
|
6 Jewish families suffer;
loss, 17,000 rubbles. |
|
|
117 |
Nov. 1 |
Ekaterinoslav |
Ekaterinoslav |
121,216 |
36,600 |
10 Jews killed; many injured;
100 shops destroyed; 5,000 families suffer. |
|
Self-Defense active: police
prevented full activity; Governor had liberated all the
prisoners according to his interpretation of the manifesto
of Oct. 30. |
118 |
Nov. 1 |
Nikopol |
Ekaterinoslav |
8,100 |
1,200 |
50 shops and 135 houses
looted. |
|
|
119 |
Nov. 1 |
Kishineff |
Bessarabia |
147,962 |
50,000 |
35 Jews and 13 Christians
killed; 100 Jews and 40 Christians injured; loss 300,000
rubles. |
|
Self-Defense active. |
120 |
Nov. 1 |
Minsk |
Minsk |
91,494 |
50,000 |
100 Jews killed; 85 seriously,
400 less seriously wounded; many Christians killed and
injured. |
|
The police disarmed the Jews
immediately before the outbreak; Governor Kurlov acquitted
of complicity. |
121 |
Nov. 1 |
Saratov |
Saratov |
137,109 |
570 |
Synagogue and Talmud Torah
pillaged and burnt; scrolls torn to shreds. |
|
|
122 |
Nov. 1 |
Nevel |
Vitebsk |
9,988 |
|
3 Jews killed; may shops
looted. |
|
|
123 |
Nov. 1 |
Niezhin |
Tchernigov |
32,100 |
|
Many killed and wounded; all
the Jewish shops destroyed. |
|
|
124 |
Nov. 1 |
Novosybhov |
Tchernigov |
15,480 |
|
Many killed and wounded;
almost all the Jewish shops and houses destroyed. |
|
|
125 |
Nov. 1 |
Nikolayev |
Kherson |
92,060 |
30,000 |
|
|
|
126 |
Nov. 1 |
Simferopol |
Taurida |
48,821 |
12,200 |
50 Jews killed; many injured;
shops and houses burnt; no looting. |
|
Riot occurred during a
patriotic demonstration. |
127 |
Nov. 2 |
Bakhmut |
Ekaterinoslav |
19,400 |
4,000 |
All the Jewish shops and
houses looted and destroyed or burnt. |
|
|
128 |
Nov. 2 |
Mariopol |
Ekaterinoslav |
31,600 |
|
|
|
|
129 |
Nov. 2 |
Yusovka |
Ekaterioslav |
|
|
12 Jews killed; 90 injured; 80
shops plundered and destroyed; the synagogue burnt; the
scrolls of the Law dishonored. |
|
|
130 |
Nov. 2 |
Novgorod-Seversk |
Tchernigov |
9,185 |
2,700 |
|
|
|
131 |
Nov. 2 |
Orel |
Orel |
69,858 |
|
Many Jews killed and wounded. |
|
|
132 |
Nov. 2 |
Rostov-on-Don |
District of the Don |
119,889 |
14,000 |
34 Jews killed; 159 injured;
1,500 families suffer; 80 industrial establishments
destroyed; loss, 7,000,000 rubles. |
|
The chief of police indicted. |
133 |
Nov. 2 |
Theodosia |
Crimea |
27,238 |
|
12 Jews killed; 300 wounded. |
|
Mob composed of hooligans. |
134 |
Nov. 2 |
Velikie-Luki |
Pskov |
8,481 |
|
200 Jewish families seriously
affected. |
|
|
135 |
Nov. 2 |
Kamenetz-Podolsk |
Podolia |
34,483 |
17,200 |
|
|
|
136 |
Nov. 2 |
Yenitchek |
Taurida |
|
|
|
|
|
137 |
Nov. 2 |
Ivanovo-Voznesensk |
Vladimir |
35,949 |
|
|
|
|
138 |
Nov. 2 |
Kazan |
Kazan |
131,508 |
|
|
|
|
139 |
Nov. 2 |
Birsula |
Kherson |
|
|
Block of warehouses destroyed. |
|
Police and troops inactive.
Jews take refuge in houses of German colonists, who turn
them away, by the order of the authorities. Railway
authorities participate in pillage. Jews ordered to leave in
7 days. |
140 |
Nov. 2 |
Zhmerinka |
Podolia |
4,000 |
|
|
|
Mob composed of only 30
hooligans; police passive. |
141 |
Nov. 3 |
Diemer |
Kiev |
|
|
|
|
|
142 |
Nov. 3 |
Gostomol |
Kiev |
|
1,200 |
|
|
Riot suppressed by
Self-Defense. |
143 |
Nov. 3 |
Rikun |
Kiev |
|
280 |
62 Jewish families suffer;
loss, 18,029 rubles. |
|
|
144 |
Nov. 3 |
Uman |
Kiev |
28,628 |
|
4 Jews killed; 50 wounded. |
|
Boys bring Jews out of their
houses by throwing stones at the windows; mob appears at
once. |
145 |
Nov. 3 |
Elisabetgrad |
Kherson |
61,841 |
24,340 |
10 Jews killed; over 100
injured; 200 houses destroyed; 1,000 families suffer. |
|
|
146 |
Nov. 3 |
Tiraspol |
Kherson |
27,585 |
|
|
|
|
147 |
Nov. 3 |
Gomel |
Mohilev |
46,446 |
26,161 |
|
|
|
148 |
Nov. 3 |
Mohilev |
Mohilev |
22,093 |
14,000 |
|
|
Riot suppressed by Bund, the
Russian Socialistic Party, and the Party of the Workingmen. |
149 |
Nov. 3 |
Orsha |
Mohilev |
13,161 |
7,000 |
30 Jews killed; their shops
destroyed. |
|
The victims killed before the
police and soldiers; the mob demand 5 rubles head money
each; the police bids them be content with the loot. |
150 |
Nov. 3 |
Tomsk |
Tomsk |
63,335 |
|
Over 1,000 Jews killed and
injured. |
|
|
151 |
Nov. 3 |
Zolotonosha |
Poltava |
8,738 |
|
500 Jewish families suffer;
whole town looted and burnt to the ground. |
|
|
152 |
Nov. 3 |
Romny |
Poltava |
22,539 |
|
8 Jews killed; 30 injured. |
|
|
153 |
Nov. 3 |
Novo-Vilaysk |
Vilna |
|
|
|
|
The chief of police tells a
Jewish deputation asking aid to look to their own for help. |
154 |
Nov. 3 |
Vilna |
Vilna |
162,633 |
80,000 |
|
|
|
155 |
Nov. 3 |
Surazh |
Tchernigov |
5,300 |
|
60 shops plundered; 70 houses
demolished. |
|
|
156 |
Nov. 3 |
Tchernigov |
Tchernigov |
27,000 |
|
6,500 families suffer. |
|
|
157 |
Nov. 3 |
Vinnitza |
Podolia |
28,995 |
|
Many Jews killed; their
property looted. |
|
|
158 |
Nov. 4 |
Golta |
Kherson |
6,584 |
|
|
|
|
159 |
Nov. 4 |
Olviopol |
Kherson |
6,838 |
|
|
|
|
160 |
Nov. 4 |
Razdelnaya |
Kherson |
|
|
9 Jews killed; 32 injured. |
|
Riot occurs at railway
station; mob stops two trains; Jewish passengers picked out
with aid of railway employees; no interference from
Christian passengers. |
161 |
Nov. 4 |
Alexandrovsk |
Ekaterinoslav |
16,393 |
|
|
|
Riot lasts 2 days. |
162 |
Nov. 4 |
Lugansk |
Ekaterinoslav |
20,419 |
|
|
|
Riot lasts 3 days. |
163 |
Nov. 4 |
Biela Tserkov |
Kiev |
22,708 |
9,000 |
Many killed and wounded;
almost all the Jewish houses looted and demolished. |
|
Riot openly directed by the
police. |
164 |
Nov. 4 |
Obukhov |
Kiev |
5,200 |
|
|
|
|
165 |
Nov. 4 |
Kozeletz |
Tchernigov |
5,160 |
|
Many Jews injured; all Jewish
dwellings destroyed; 63 shops looted; loss, 25,000 rubles. |
|
All the wounded of the
Self-Defense. |
166 |
Nov. 4 |
Krolevetz |
Tchernigov |
10,375 |
|
|
|
|
167 |
Nov. 4 |
Bryansk |
Orel |
23,520 |
|
Every Jewish house destroyed. |
|
|
168 |
Nov. 4 |
Krementchug |
Poltava |
58,648 |
11,000 |
20 Jews killed; 80 injured; of
the mob also many killed and wounded. |
|
Self-Defense energetic. |
169 |
Nov. 4 |
Romny |
Poltava |
22,539 |
|
5 Jews killed; 20 wounded; 15
large warehouses looted and burnt. |
|
|
170 |
Nov. 4 |
Polotsk |
Vitebsk |
20,751 |
10,000 |
|
|
|
171 |
Nov. 4 |
Riga |
Curland |
282,943 |
30,700 |
Very large number of killed;
no looting. |
|
All the victims of the
Self-Defense, consisting of Jews and Letts. |
172 |
Nov. 4 |
Voronezh |
Voronezh |
84,146 |
|
123 Shops and dwellings looted
and demolished. |
|
Riot wholly under direction of
the chief of police ad three assistants in the police
department. |
173 |
Nov. 4 |
Yaroslav |
Yaroslav |
70,610 |
|
All the Jewish shops and
dwellings burnt. |
|
|
174 |
Nov. 5 |
Poltava |
Poltava |
53,060 |
7,600 |
400 Jewish families suffer. |
|
|
175 |
Nov. 5 |
Gadiatch |
Poltava |
7,714 |
|
20 houses demolished. |
|
At the end of 4 days the
rioters stopped by the citizens themselves. |
176 |
Nov. 5 |
Voronovka |
Poltava |
|
|
15 shops and 13 houses looted
and burnt. |
|
|
177 |
Nov. 5 |
Klintzy |
Tchernigov |
|
|
All the Jewish shops and
houses without exception demolished; 400 families ruined. |
|
|
178 |
Nov. 5 |
Akkerman |
Bessarabia |
28,308 |
4,846 |
|
|
|
179 |
Nov. 5 |
Tchutchuleny |
Bessarabia |
|
|
All Jewish property destroyed. |
|
The peasants defend the Jews,
and kill the soldier who instigated the riot. |
180 |
Nov. 5 |
Irkutsk |
Irkutsk |
51,434 |
8,239 |
|
|
|
181 |
Nov. 5 |
Rezhitza |
Vitebsk |
10,681 |
|
|
|
|
182 |
Nov. 5 |
Novogeorgievsk |
Kherson |
11,200 |
|
All Jewish shops and houses
plundered. |
|
|
183 |
Nov. 6 |
Ananiev |
Kherson |
16,713 |
7,650 |
|
|
|
184 |
Nov. 6 |
Mardarovka |
Kherson |
|
|
|
|
|
185 |
Nov. 6 |
Starodub |
Tchernigov |
12,451 |
|
|
|
|
186 |
Nov. 6 |
Voronok |
Tchernigov |
5,700 |
|
50 families suffer. |
|
|
187 |
Nov. 6 |
Yegoryevsk |
Ryazan |
19,244 |
|
|
|
|
188 |
Nov. 6 |
Potek |
Kiev |
|
|
|
|
|
189 |
Nov. 6 |
Okna |
Podolia |
4,323 |
|
|
|
|
190 |
Nov. 7 |
Bogopol |
Podolia |
3,700 |
|
|
|
|
191 |
Nov. 7 |
Kalarash |
Bessarabia |
5,000 |
2,800 |
100 Jews killed; 80 wounded;
the whole town burnt to the ground: loss, 2,000,000 rubles. |
|
|
192 |
Nov. 7 |
Nossovitch |
Kherson |
|
|
|
|
|
193 |
Nov. 7 |
Ryazan |
Ryazan |
44,552 |
|
|
|
|
194 |
Nov. 7 |
Vesiely-Terny |
Ekaterinoslav |
|
|
Many Jews killed and wounded;
loss, 200,000 rubles. |
|
|
195 |
Nov. 7 |
Semyanovka |
Tchernigov |
|
12,000 |
10 Jews killed: very many
injured; whole town destroyed. |
|
|
196 |
Nov. 8 |
Stolna |
Tchernigov |
|
|
|
|
|
197 |
Nov. 10 |
Lyskovo |
Nishni-Novgorod |
7,800 |
|
All the Jewish shops looted. |
|
|
198 |
Nov. ? |
Novomoskovsk |
Ekaterinoslav |
12,862 |
1,147 |
|
|
|
199 |
Nov. ? |
Tatarinovka |
Zhitomir |
|
|
All the Jewish houses burnt. |
|
|
200 |
Nov. 18 |
Dobrinetz |
|
|
|
|
|
|
201 |
Nov. 19 |
Kishineff |
Bessarabia |
147,962 |
50,000 |
Many shops looted and burnt;
many Jews killed and wounded. |
|
Desperate resistance by Jewish
youths supported by Christian students. |
202 |
Nov. ? |
Kremenetz |
Volhynia |
17,618 |
11,000 |
|
|
|
203 |
Nov. ? |
Likhovka |
Ekaterinoslav |
|
|
4 wounded; loss, 18,000
rubles. |
|
|
204 |
Nov. 24 |
Akkerman |
Bessarabia |
28,308 |
4,846 |
Many killed. |
|
|
205 |
Nov. ? |
Novotcherkask |
District of the Don |
52,005 |
|
All the Jewish houses
demolished. |
|
|
206 |
Nov. 27 |
Kurbatova |
Voronezh |
5,000 |
|
House of only Jewish family
plundered. |
|
|
207 |
Nov. 28 |
Kovel |
Volhynia |
17,403 |
6,046 |
|
|
|
208 |
Nov. 29 |
Yartzev |
Smolensk |
|
|
|
|
The outrages committed by
workingmen. |
209 |
Nov. 30 |
Ismail |
Bessarabia |
31,293 |
|
|
|
|
210 |
Nov. ? |
Daragonovo |
Minsk |
|
|
|
|
|
211 |
Nov. ? |
Baku |
Baku |
112,253 |
2,000 |
|
|
|
212 |
Nov. ? |
Balta |
Podolia |
23,893 |
18,480 |
Many killed and injured; 60
shops and 200 houses looted and burnt; loss, 2,000,000
rubles. |
|
|
213 |
Nov. ? |
Eupatoria |
Taurida |
17,915 |
2,999 |
|
|
|
214 |
Nov. ? |
Koroletz |
Tchernigov |
|
|
|
|
|
215 |
Nov. ? |
Kostroma |
Kostroma |
41,268 |
|
|
|
|
216 |
Nov. ? |
Kriukov |
Kherson |
1,200 |
|
|
|
|
217 |
Nov. 2 |
Tchelyabinsk |
Orenburg |
19,891 |
|
16 Jewish houses looted and
destroyed. |
|
Police inactive. |
218 |
Nov. ? |
Tula |
Tula |
111,408 |
|
80 Jews killed and injured. |
|
|
219 |
Nov. ? |
Vitebsk |
Vitebsk |
66,143 |
39,520 |
|
|
|
220 |
Nov. ? |
Voroshilovka |
|
|
|
6 Jews wounded. |
|
Bullet wounds. |
221 |
Dec. 8 |
Nosovka |
Tchernigov |
11,200 |
|
100 Jewish families suffer. |
|
|
222 |
Dec. ? |
Bershad |
Podolia |
7,000 |
5,000 |
|
|
|
223 |
Dec. ? |
Czeladz |
|
|
|
|
|
|
224 |
Dec. ? |
Berezna |
Tchernigov |
9,921 |
|
10 Jews wounded; 200 Jewish
families suffer. |
|
|
225 |
Dec. ? |
Zdana-Bolyarska |
|
|
|
|
|
|
226 |
Dec. 12 |
Elisabetpol |
Kherson |
|
|
Jews killed and Jewish quarter
plundered. |
|
|
227 |
Dec. ? |
Soflevka |
Ekaterinoslav |
|
|
|
|
|
228 |
Dec. ? |
Lilvinovka |
Bessarabia |
|
|
6 families suffer; loss, 5,180
rubles. |
|
|
229 |
Dec. ? |
Lutesh |
|
|
|
2 families suffer; loss, 2,700
rubles. |
|
|
230 |
Dec. ? |
Mitrotzky |
|
|
|
2 families suffer; loss, 540
rubles. |
|
|
231 |
Dec. ? |
Novo-Petrivetz |
|
|
|
11 families suffer; loss,
17,532 rubles. |
|
|
232 |
Dec. ? |
Yablonovka |
|
|
|
One family suffers; loss, 600
rubles. |
|
|
233 |
Dec. 25 |
Katelnia |
|
|
|
|
|
|
234 |
Dec. ? |
Singur |
|
|
|
|
|
|
235 |
Dec. ? |
Srebny |
Poltava |
|
|
|
|
|
236 |
Dec. ? |
Vaskovtzy |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1906 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
237 |
Jan. 2 |
Gorodishche |
Kiev |
3,973 |
|
|
|
|
238 |
Jan. ? |
Ivanitzy |
Poltava |
|
|
|
|
|
239 |
Jan. ? |
Beresovka |
Podolia |
|
|
|
|
|
240 |
Jan. 23 |
Khodorovka |
Kiev |
|
|
29 shops plundered. |
|
|
241 |
Jan. 26 |
Kuban |
|
|
|
60 large and 50 small shops
destroyed. |
|
|
242 |
Jan. 26 |
Gomel |
Mohilev |
46,446 |
26,161 |
Loss, 3,000,000 rubles. |
|
Police assist the hooligans;
soldiers led by the police commissioner fire on the Jews. |
243 |
Jan. 31 |
Vasilikov |
Kiev |
17,824 |
|
Every Jewish shop and house
plundered and burnt. |
|
|
244 |
Jan. ? |
Khotimsk |
Mohilev |
|
|
|
|
|
245 |
Jan. ? |
Sharnishni |
|
|
|
|
|
|
246 |
Feb. ? |
Bershevka |
|
|
|
|
|
|
247 |
? ? |
Lappy |
|
|
|
|
|
|
248 |
? ? |
Pinczov |
Kielce |
8,095 |
|
|
|
|
249 |
Feb. 19 |
Vyatka |
Vyatka |
15,776 |
|
|
|
Rioters and incendiarism. |
250 |
June 14 |
Bialystok |
Grodno |
63,927 |
48,552 |
200 Jews killed; 700 injured;
169 shops and houses plundered; 8 streets completely sacked;
loss, 200,000 (?) rubles. |
|
The Jews offer stout
resistance; the police and troops suppress the Self-Defense;
the Deputy-Governor of Grodno and commissioner of police at
Bialystok promoted. Propagandist pamphlets issued from the
Government presses. (See Duma Commission Report appended,
p. 70) |
251 |
June 16 |
Boyary |
Grodno |
|
|
|
|
|
252 |
June ? |
Tchernaya-Viesh |
Grodno |
|
|
|
|
|
253 |
June 18 |
Staroselzy |
Grodno |
|
|
50 Jews killed. |
|
|
254 |
June ? |
Posin |
Vitebsk |
|
|
|
|
Soldiers break into a
synagogue during a service. |
ALPHABETICAL LIST OF THE TOWNS IN THE
TABLE OF POGROMS
SUPPLEMENTARY LIST OF TOWNS IN
WHICH POGROMS OCCURRED, NOVEMBER,
1905
THE GUBERNIAS IN WHICH POGROMS OCCURRED
|
REPORT OF THE DUMA COMMISSION ON THE
BIALYSTOK MASSACRE
The Commission of Inquiry into the illegal acts
of Government officials has received the report of the members of
the Duma, M. P. Arakantzeff, 1. G. Schtchepkin, and V. R.
Jacobso hn,
who were delegated by the Duma to go to Bialystok to
inquire on the spot into the causes of and the evidence relating to
the riots. After an examination of the report, the Commission makes
the following statement of facts:-
On June 1st (14th), a pogrom broke out in
Bialystok which lasted until the 3d (16th). During the pogrom many
were killed, many wounded, and Jewish property was destroyed. Up to
this moment it is not exactly known how many were killed and how
many were wounded because some of the killed were carried out of
the town and were not brought into the Jewish hospital; and many of
the wounded were treated at their own homes. Eightytwo wounded Jews
were brought into the Jewish hospital, among whom were three burnt
bodies and seventeen wounded. To the Christian hospital six killed
and twelve wounded Christians were brought. The pogrom took place in
the following circumstances: A few days before June 1, rumors were
circulated in Bialystok about the preparation of a pogrom. The
master of the police, Derkatcheff, was murdered on the 28th of May.
The murder of Derkatcheff was a very dark and
mysterious affair. Derkatcheff had enjoyed much popularity among the Jews, to such an
extent that he used to be called
"the Jewish master of the police." Derkatcheff was
opposed to any outrages or riots;
so he
was, on the 21st of
May, delegated by General Bogaiewski to the Surash Street, where a
conflict arose between soldiers and local residents. When
Derkatcheff appeared on the spot he immediately succeeded in ending
the disturbance, but a sharp counter-dispute arose between him and
the
police-officer Sheremetieff, who was a striking contrast to
Derkatcheff. In consequence of this occurrence the latter not only
asked the Governor to dismiss Sheremetieff, but
he insisted on the prominent citizens of Bialystok
supporting him
in this
application. The residents of Bialystok, however, looked on
Sheremetieff with suspicion. The murders of police officials which
had previously occurred in Bialystok excited the anger of the
police against all Bialystok Jews, whom they used to accuse of being
the cause of these murders. Besides this, the Organization of the
so-called Genuine Russian Men was continually propagating the idea
that the Jews are the enemies of Czardom, and that all the evils and
the whole confusion in the country emanate from Jews or from the
Jewish agitation: that therefore the struggle with the Jews was a
struggle with the conspiracy which was ruining the country, and that
in conquering the Jews the conspiracy would be combated, and then
there would be peace and quietness. These opinions were very deeply
rooted among the police officials, and from them they passed to the
obscure masses, who were influenced by the police. Shortly before
the pogrom two camps were formed, one consisting of the police with
the Black Hundred, and the other of Jews and those who are taking
part in the movement for freedom. The latter were considered as
enemies to Russ ia and of the established order, and the police, as
well as their agents, were excited against and opposed to them and
the Jews. The fact that besides the Bund there existed in Bialystok
an anarchist party (the Surash Street was particularly unpopular
among the police, who did not venture to appear there) was not
unknown to the police, who accused all the Jews of being
anarchists. The word "Jew" and the word
"conspirator" were synonyms to the police and they used the word
"revolutionary" to designate a Jew or a conspirator. It was a duty
of course to fight revolutionaries and to annihilate them. For this
purpose fighting material was prepared in the army by the agitation
of the Black Hundred. Proclamations began to circulate among the
soldiers stating that one must kill the conspirators, that the
Imperial Duma was Jewish, that the revolutionaries were opposed to
the Czar, and so on. After May 3, the sergeants in one of the
regimental barracks were commanded to communicate to the soldiers
that on the 1st of the following June a Catholic procession would
take place, among which the Jews would throw a bomb, and there
would be a pogrom. At the same time rumors were circulated by the
policesergeants about the expected pogrom. In consequence, the
people of the town began to talk about it, and some of them were so
sure that there would be a pogrom that they sent their families away
from the town.
How the police looked upon the Jews is shown by
the dispute between the police inspector Sheremetieff
and the
leaders of the Jewish community, about the question of putting a
wreath on the coffin of Derkatcheff. "What, a wreath from Jews!
Never! We are Christians, not Jews, vampires. You kill us and
afterwards you come with wreaths. No! I shall not allow it." On
this occasion Sheremetieff talked also about the police, predicting
that they would protest against the placing of a wreath by Jews on
the
coffin; and when the Jewish leaders asked what form the protest
would take, Sheremetieff replied:
"If you will, in
spite of my warning, put a wreath on the coffin, you will regret it
within two days, and the whole Jewish population will regret it."
No better was the reception of the Jewish leaders by the Governor of
Grodno, M. Kister, to whom the frightened Jewish community sent a
deputation. He remarked upon the hatred against the Jews amongst the
police, because of their continually attacking them, and said that
the murderers were without doubt Jewish, and so on.
"I read every day," the Governor added,
"the
dossier of political offenses,
and all the offenders are Jewish. Jews are attacking the soldiers,
and provoke their hatred also. The moment may arrive when nothing
can be done
against the violent wrath of the soldiers; and if I am
present at the funeral of Derkatcheff and shots are fired, I
will
order an attack on the town. As to Thursday, June 1, I make myself
responsible, but not afterwards. In Bialystok there has been no
state of war, but a sort of confusion; as during a state of war
there is martial law, and we have had no martial law. The Commandant
of the Bialystok Garrison, General von Bader, is also convinced
that the Jewish community Is responsible for several bomb
outrages."
So we see that the Governor knew very well that
a pogrom was being prepared, and that he knew this not only from the
reports of the local administration, which was under his command,
but also from the leaders of the community, who described to him the
real condition and the circumstances of the place. As to the
attitude of the Christian population to the Jews, all the evidences
are unanimous in proving that it was quite normal, that there was
never any danger of a conflict, that there was no hatred of a
national, religious, or economic character, that even the
competition between the Christian and the Jewish workmen in the
factories never
provoked any conflict, although the police
endeavored to excite the people and to provoke quarrels. The small
occasional disputes between Jews and Christians were always
peacefully settled. Jewish and Christian witnesses bear out this
fact unanimously. The same opinion was expressed by the Bialystok
Duma at a public
meeting on the 5th of June.
Meanwhile the pogrom was prepared. On the 21st
of May a general order was given to the Sixteenth Division of
Infantry that on June 1 a much larger number of pickets should be
posted in the place. The town was divided into two districts,
northern and southern. For the first Colonel Voitchekhovski was
appointed, for the second Colonel Bukowski, the general command
remaining in the hands of the Chief of the Division. In the same
order the rules of conduct for the soldiers were laid down.
Thursday, June 1st, arrived. Greek-Orthodox
processions came to the town from the villages and hamlets and
formed themselves into a large procession, which began to pass
through the streets Lipova, Nikolaieva, and Alexandrova. On the same
day a Catholic procession proceeded from the Catholic Church to the
cemetery of Saint Roekh. The processions attracted a large number of
Christians. When the Greek Orthodox procession began to pass from
the Alexandrova
Street to the Institute Street some shots were
fired near the house of Rachites, which is situated at the corner,
or not far from it, near the houses belonging to Mackovski and
Solman. Some people imagined they noticed also the throwing of
something, and that there was a slight explosion. A tumult
arose
and
many people threw the ikons and other religious emblems on the
pavements. It appeared afterwards that there, at the Alexandrova
Street, a woman named Minkowska and a man named Damiduk were hurt.
Immediately soldiers arrived who were posted as it seems in the
courtyard of the Imperial Bank and began shooting at the houses and
at the "Kaznatcheistvo" (treasury). The soldiers fired so quickly
that the people had no time to run away from the tumult. As to
Minkowska, all the physicians are of opinion that she was wounded by
a bullet. Immediately after the first firing a crowd of hooligans
attacked and pillaged a chemist's shop belonging to a Christian
named Knoblauch. They did the same with the Jewish houses and shops
in the vicinity and they began to kill the Jews.
When the remnant of the procession had returned
to the Greek Orthodox Church and a crowd of rioters rushed to the
Surash Street, somebody threw a bomb at the corner of the street
from the place opposite. The bomb caused no damage. It seems that
the bomb was thrown only to frighten the hooligans who began to run
away quickly. In the street there were no police or soldiers, but
from the market-place the soldiers were firing in the direction of
Surash Street.
As though at a pre-arranged signal the pogrom
arose in different places. With extraordinary speed the rumor
spread that a Greek Orthodox Pope and a Polish priest were killed,
that Jews had fired on the ikons, that they had murdered a Christian
woman; and similar horrible stories. A Russian writer, an official
named Stukalitch, living in Grodno, contributed to the propagation
of this falsehood. He wired
officially that atrocities had been
committed by Jews. Many of the officers believed these statements,
and threatened the Jews with revenge.
It is noteworthy that the officers and the
hooligans, who are not usually well disposed towards each other,
fraternized during the disturbances. For instance, two officers
approached a company of hooligans who were rioting on the
market-place, and conversed with them in a friendly manner. One
company of hooligans were running in the
direction of the Lipova Street, but one of the officers called them
to return from there and directed them to go to the Nikolaieva
Street, whither they went.
A
policeman who subsequently noticed some other hooligans, sent them
also to that street, and afterwards a company of soldiers were sent
there, too. The company fired, but the hooligans quietly proceeded
with their nefarious work, knowing that the firing did not concern
them. Similar facts were noted in many places. Hooligans,
aided
by policemen,
wrecked shops and pillaged goods whilst the soldiers
stood by and shot every Jew who appeared in the street. The
hooligans were never injured by the firing, nor were they prevented
from committing outrages. Not only policemen and hooligans,
but even
the military,
joined In the pillaging. One soldier who had plundered
so many wares that he could not carry them away, asked one of
his
comrades to assist him.
From the Thursday to Saturday there was a
continuous fusillade in the town, as on a battlefield, although no
enemy was to be seen. The fusillade was directed only against Jews.
If a Christian walked through the street nobody assailed him, but
as soon as a Jew appeared, bullets flew at him from all sides. Many
of the houses and shops in the town are damaged by the bullets. It
was not a struggle between two
adversaries; It was a hunt by armed
men of unarmed people. Whenever anyone fired, the soldiers arrived
upon the scene and poured a volley into the street and on the
houses. On Friday, the police were specially furious, and searched
the houses for Jews who might be hiding.
During all this time the secret agents of the
police were endeavoring to provoke fresh disturbances and supply a
pretext for further attacks upon the Jews. The police fired and
attributed the firing to the Jews. They called upon the military to
fire upon the Jews. All Jews, even quite old men, were named as
revolutionaries, and immediately killed. The result was always the
same, whether the charge was made by a policeman, a soldier, or a
hooligan. Afterwards it became superfluous to charge the Jews with
being revolutionaries. It was quite sufficient to cry out "Jew!"
and to call the attention of a soldier to an
individual who was running through the street. or was in hiding, for
the soldier immediately to shoot him. During these days, namely,
Friday and Saturday, pillage was not the leading feature of the
pogrom. It was murder, committed by the police and the military. All
the bodies of the killed during these two days bore bullet and
bayonet wounds, and very seldom injuries caused by sticks or stones.
Some of the killed had wounds of both kinds.
The following facts afford conclusive
evidence:-
At the Railway Station
In spite of the presence of the governor , the gendarmes, and the
soldiers, the hooligans felt quite safe at the railway station.
Nobody tried to prevent them from doing their
"work." On the
contrary, they were encouraged and assisted in every way. Upon the
arrival of every train, whenever Jewish passengers appeared on the
platform, the hooligans began to cry:
"Shidi!
Beat the
Shidi," and they started attacking the Jews with canes, stones,
and sticks. Some Jews ran
away and fled along the bridge to the
town. But on the other side of the bridge military pickets were
posted, and policemen searched them to see whether they carried
weapons. They were driven back into the hands of the murderers. Some
Jews escaped to the railway-station, but brutal attacks were made on
them by the hooligans, who were standing at the station-gate. The
hooligans created scenes too terrible for description. They
penetrated into the first-class refreshment room, where some Jews
had hidden, and dragged them out to the gate, where they slaughtered
them in cold blood. The commandant, the gendarmes, and the officers
looked on indifferently at the butchery of these unarmed, helpless
men lying wounded on the ground. The agonies which the poor martyrs
suffered did not provoke the slightest emotion on the part of the
officials. On the contrary, they seemed to be much amused and
delighted, and they incited the hooligans to
"work" more
ardently. A few officers tried to interfere in favor of the Jews,
but the hooligans were so self-confident and audacious that they
paid no attention to the officers and continued their bestial work.
It was a general carnage.
One of the Jews fought and struggled, bit and
kicked for dear life, and succeeded in escaping from the hands of
the mob and entering the station. He was covered with blood. and had
one eye kicked out, but the hooligans standing at the entrance of
the station-room surrounded him and began beating him mercilessly.
They caught him by the legs and swung him on the stones. The witness
C. (who was present) does not know what was the end of this shocking
incident as he was compelled to hide himself.
A Jew, of the name of Mulovir, who was knocked
down, and punched, and cut in numerous places,
saw the mob beating
the Jews in the first-class waiting room. He rushed up to the
kitchen on the highest floor, but the hooligans seized him there and
began cudgelling him. He succeeded in escaping. There was with him
another Jew, Abramski, who jumped through the window to the ground
and broke one of his legs.
While all these scenes of horror were taking
place, the governor was present at the station.
Throughout this unchecked massacre, the
official bureaucracy was entirely on the side of the rough element.
This is confirmed by the following fact. On Thursday, the officer of
the gendarmes G. addressed a band of hooligans. He called their
attention to the fact that at the railway station they could
slaughter only poor people. and he therefore recommended them to
turn to the centre of the town where they could pillage
shops and
kill the proprietors. The "rotmistr" of the frontier-guard Z.
was present, and added: "The Jews who wear black shirts ought
to suffer this fate. Beat them to
death."
On Friday,
15th June,
the atrocities at the
railway station increased in brutality. A Jew. of the name of
Kurrekta. who gained two crosses of St. George for distinction
during the war and was saved by an officer,
states that several Jews
arrived at the station along with himself. They were violently
beaten,
fell to the ground fainting,
and were then killed. He
witnessed the murdering of Shimon Salmen. who arrived from the
little village of Trostiantzi,
Mordvha Lew and Bruinski. His own
escape was miraculous. As he lay hidden on the roof he saw most
terrible scenes. The hooligans beat the dead bodies with stones in
the presence of the gendarmes.
Seven Jews from Goniondz. terrified by the news
of the massacres in Bialystok,
came to save their families. The
hooligans were utterly enraged by the sight of these seven Jews.
They attacked them like savages and slaughtered five of them. Two
were saved by one of the soldiers. They succeeded in escaping to
Grodno,
and there reported the events at the railway station. A Jew,
of the name of Horovitz, was saved by the artillery soldiers. Serge
Mlkhailovitch Lostshenko.
Another Jew,
of the same name,
was murdered by
the hooligans. He had hidden himself behind the commandant
begging for mercy, but the commandant pushed him away, and the
hooligans attacked him like wild beasts,
chewing his clothing and
biting him--his body bearing several marks of external violence. This
scene was witnessed also by a man named Arkin who was at the railway
station.
When a lady who was present had almost gone out
of her mind at the sight of the horrors,
an officer tried to calm
her just as if nothing out of the ordinary was taking place, saying:
We must look quietly at all these scenes,
because the Jews deserved
much more for having thrown bombs at a procession and killed our
priests; they deserve to be completely annihilated.
So it appears that the extravagant falsehood
published by the police about the killing of priests was not the
suggestion of sheer lunacy,
but part of a deliberately manufactured
intrigue.
When the train of the South-Western Railway
arrived, ten Jews came out of the cars,
eight of them were killed in
atrocious fashion. Kronenberg,
who succeeded in escaping,
saw how
these eight Jews were killed. Many soldiers, officers,
and gendarmes
were present. In the waiting-room
was the inspector Rondkovski, with
the assistant
procurator of Bialystok. Rondkovskl and the
assistant-procurator were standing at the window watching the
murdering of these poor victims. When Kronenberg arrived at 6
o'clock in the evening at Grodno,
he went to the Governor, where he
met also the assistant-procurator. When he reported the carnage at
the railway station,
the Governor replied: "It is the Jews'
fault,
as they have fired and thrown many bombs."
On inquiry, it was stated by a man named Bibula that nine Jews and
one Jewess arrived by the train, and on their journey they had been
guarded by gendarmes and soldiers. The latter accompanied them to
the terminus, but at the station left them. The poor people then
fell into the hands of the hooligans, who knocked them down on the
pavement and beat them to death. No official appeared on the scene of
these horrible occurrences. It was heartrending to hear the cries
and the groans of the victims. One of the Christian civilians did
his utmost to intervene. but he was immediately killed. The
engineer Isfirsvod states that a student was killed. The victims
writhing with agony were knocked and pushed, thrown and flung and
beaten with iron pegs and sticks. Their cries were heard at a
considerable distance from the scene of the barbarities.
"Boyari"
"Boyari" is the name of a suburb of Bialystok. There Is a tannery
there belonging to Polivshtshouk. Eye-witnesses made a lucid and
detailed statement to the effect, that on Friday, the 3/15 of June,
a workman named Verbitzki brought to the spot a detachment of
soldiers, indicating that there were Jews hidden there. The soldiers
tried to penetrate into the tannery through the front door, but they
were not successful. Meanwhile. a mob gathered in the vicinity. The
soldiers and hooligans forced the entrance from behind, destroying a
back door. The remaining soldiers were posted in the street, mixed
with gendarmes, and among the latter was one of the name of Shoultz.
The Jews who were hidden in the tannery ran out panic-stricken on to
the balcony crying for help. Suddenly the soldiers and the
gendarmes began to fire on them, killing a man named Gourtzmann. In
the tannery Shlomo Fourmann and Lieb Mayour were also killed. The
son of the proprietor, Polivshtshouk, was arrested by the soldiers
and was beaten while being led to the police station. He was
severely injured.
The next morning,
Saturday. the 4/16 of June,
at 9 o'clock, the workman Mikhalks came into the tannery, and having
noticed that Isaac Bakhrakh, Isaac Tsemnik and Zourakh Reznik were
hidden there, he ran at top speed to bring soldiers. The soldiers
came and killed Bakhrakh and Tsemnik; Reznik escaped, but he was caught and imprisoned. They accuse him, without any foundation, of
having killed a woman.
On the same Friday (3/15 of June), several
Jews living around a "liesopilnia" (saw-mill) which belongs
to Zablondovski, at the Nikolaievskaia, gathered in Zablondovski's
courtyard and hid themselves there. Some of them hid in the
factory,
some in the rooms of the caretaker Petkevitch and the
master Nemiro. The caretaker and the master refused to allow the
Jews to stay
in their rooms, as the
police had forbidden them to give refuge to
any Jew. So they passed to the boiler-room where the heat was
terrible, and the children were almost choked by the air in the
narrow abode.
When the massacres on the Nikolaievskaia were
over, the Jews suffering with their children the torments of hell in
the factory, decided to go out. Some of them went to the house
belonging to Abraham Katz, some remained in the saw-mill, and
others passed to the office of the factory. The house belonging to
Abraham Katz is situated near a garden on one side of Boyari. When
the soldiers had finished with the saw-mill they destroyed the
hedge, penetrated into the house of Zablondovski, and started
firing into the house of Abraham Katz. Their comrades, who were at a
distance, noticing what was going on, began to fire themselves on
the same house, so that the building was violently attacked from two
sides and took fire.
A policeman, accompanied by two soldiers,
appeared and commanded the women and the children to leave the
house. Some came out immediately, and others a little later. The men
came out with their wives and children. The first who jumped out was
Abraham Katz. He was instantaneously bayonetted by the soldiers,
who were surrounding the burning house. The second, who was shot on
the spot, was Nakhman Borovski. He carried in his hands a baby, two
years old; the baby was severely hurt by a bullet. The third one who
ran out was Shoulem Novik, carrying a baby in his arms, his wife
Taube following. An officer commanded Novik to deliver the baby to
his wife. When Novik refused, he was
flogged until he lost
consciousness, and a soldier murdered him in a brutal manner. In
similar way instructions were given to kill without mercy Semkha
Veinstein, Hirsh Hepner, Zourakh Pande, and Mordkha Shmouklar. The
old Jewess, Taube, and two unknown persons, had no time to escape,
and were burnt alive. Two Jews hid themselves in a cellar which was
full of water. The whole night, between Friday and Saturday, they
lay in the water. Next morning they were discovered by two soldiers.
One of them ransomed himself for 60 copecks; the other, Joel
Tvorkovski, had no money, and was killed.
When the firemen came, they were not allowed by
the police to do their work. There were no revolutionaries in the
house, nobody fired a shot from the building, although the official
report mentions such incidents. The whole idea of firing from this
house on the police
office is absurd, as it is impossible from there
to reach the police-station, which is 400 to 600 feet away, and
separated by a big store-house of two
floors. The soldiers who
bombarded and set fire to the house of Abraham Katz were commanded
by the officer B. The commissioner of police of the second district
was also present.
On the same day, Friday, Moshe and Ber Naviazki
were passing by the small Slonim Street. A crowd of hooligans with
police met them. The commissaire de police of the second district
was also there. The two brothers saw that they were in danger and
began begging the commissaire to save their lives. But not only was
no effort made by him to protect them, but he turned away. The
hooligans understood the
signal and began stripping and flogging the
two Jews. Ber Naviazki was found dead on the spot, and Moshe
dangerously wounded. The hooligans also robbed their victims.
On Saturday, the 4/16 of June, at six o'clock
in the evening, a detachment of soldiers, led by policemen, was
marching along the small Slonim Street, when one of the hooligans
approached them and whispered that Jews were hidden in Minkovski's
stovefactory. Immediately the soldiers went there and discovered a
Jew named Souravitch in the cellar. They commanded him to leave, but
he refused. Then a soldier dragged him by the hair of his head and
ordered him to go away. Souravitch would not go without protection,
whereupon another soldier killed him. These soldiers belonged to the
Kazan regiment.
Although Boyari is the most peaceful part of
the town, it was just there that the hooligans robbed, beat, and
murdered every Jew they met. In one of the houses they had wrecked
and destroyed everything. Later on they discovered a Jew and were
bent on killing him, when he ransomed himself for 200 rubles. This
gift produced such a favorable impression that they accompanied
him, and protected him from the "wrath of the people," allowing
nobody to lay hands on him.
In the courtyard of the same factory the mob
mercilessly beat another Jew. They met an old Jew and, with a sharp
ladle, tore the entire skin from off his head and face. The bodies
of the murdered as well as the wounded people were not carried away
until the fire brigade came.
When the soldiers had finished their labors at
the stovefactory, they
divided into two bands, one of which went
to the field, while the other one rushed to the gardens to search
for Jews. Some Jews who were afraid to remain in their houses took
refuge in the gardens belonging to Christians with the permission
of the proprietors. In one of the gardens a Jew, named Levin, was
found. The soldiers began to attack him. He
fought and struggled until a policeman came and fired five bullets
at him. He continued struggling with his murderers until he was
terribly wounded. Then one of the hooligans knocked him on the head with a heavy stone,
and he collapsed. In the same garden a soldier killed another Jew.
Mobs, led by
policemen, sought out the Jews the
whole day. Afterwards two Jews were discovered; one of them, was
Shloma Proushenski. The hooligans cried: "These are
anarchists! Kill them!" One of the soldiers seemed not to agree and
ran away. They addressed a complaint to his superiors. The other
soldiers commanded the Jews to retire to the rear. The Jews, knowing that the soldiers
would
fire on them, refused, upon which the hooligans began to beat them
with their sticks. When they were half-dead the soldiers shot them
dead.
At last, the soldiers and the hooligans
penetrated into a house, dragged out a Jew named Einstein and killed
him and his two sons, Shmuel and Terakhmirl. Afterwards they dragged
out of the house the mother, Shina, and her daughter, Saon (Sonia)
Einstein. Sonia tried to run away, a soldier wounded her with a
bullet, and a policeman, seeing that she was still alive, fires and
kills her. A soldier commanded the mother to move a
little aside. The
moment she takes up this position a soldier shoots her. Thus was a
whole family wiped out.
A certain confusion among the hooligans was
provoked by the death of Khodakevitch. In the gard en belonging to
Khodakevitch a certain number of Jews had hidden themselves.
Khodakevitch took a hatchet and went to repair a hole in the
fences of the garden. At that moment the soldiers were shooting from
both sides, and it is said that a policeman was wounded by this
firing. It seems that one of the bullets killed Khodakevitch, but
one of his hands was also cut. The hooligans noticed that and were
delighted by this discovery. They began crying: The Jews killed the
proprietor of the garden. Everybody knows that that was a lie. No
Jew would kill a Christian who protected Jews. Khodakevitch was
buried very soon and secretly, so it
was not known whether his hand
was cut before or after death. Khodakevitch's daughter in her
despair at the loss of her father requested the police-master,
Matjevitch, to inquire into the matter. Matjevitch came, and when he
saw the numerous bodies of murdered Jews, he exclaimed ironically:
"This is the punishment for our dead."
On Saturday morning a fresh detachment of
soldiers appeared, with police. They
began searching and dragged a
Jewish workman out of a stove. They asked him: What are you doing
here? The poor, frightened workman did not reply. Then the policeman
ordered him to be beaten and a soldier seized him by the throat and
crushed his skull with his rifle. A policeman took pity on the
workman, who was in agony. and ordered him to be shot. The man was
killed by three bullets.
Individual
Cases
(1) On Friday Lejba Ginzburg was In his lodging
in the house of Bronekera in the Zaniejska Street. He was afraid
to go out. Somebody knocked at the door. Ginzberg did not open it. The
door was then broken open and the police-sergeant of the fourth
district, named Bajbok, accompanied by soldiers, entered and ordered
the soldiers to fire. One of the soldiers fired and killed
Ginzburg's wife. Chana Binema, and wounded her sister, Rochla
Annalni. The latter, still suffering from the wounds, gave evidence
to the Commission. Bajbok, not satisfied with the work he had
already done, dragged out of Ginzburg's lodging a Jewess, named Kustinowa Hinda Leja, who was carrying a baby, and ordered a soldier
to fire. The soldier fired, but instead of the mother the baby was
killed. The same sergeant searched the house, but did not discover
anything. Nevertheless. he ordered two Jews, Joselowi Wot and
Nachim, to follow him. When they came to the wall of a newly built
house he commanded the soldiers to fire on them. Wot was severely
wounded. Nachim fell on his knees and begged for mercy. He was
bayonetted.
(2) On June 14 during
the firing on the house of Torpacki, three Jews were wounded in
their lodgings, Brianski. Prelagnawargo and Weinciter.
The latter
begged policeman No. 160,
Markowski, to bring
ice. Instead of ice he
brought some pillaged goods. Weinciter himself then went to fetch
ice, but the moment he appeared out of the gate a shot was fired at
him from the corner of the Lipova Street, and he was killed.
(3) After the firing on the Greek Orthodox
procession. the soldiers began to fire on the house of Rachites in
the Alexandrova Street. The Chief of the Kazan Regiment arrived, and
when he heard rumors of the throwing of a bomb he ordered the
soldiers to enter the Jewish houses and to drag out the occupants.
The soldiers went into the hall of the house of a Jew named
Lapidus, and began to drive out his family. The hooligans then
forced an entrance.
On the left side of the house the hooligans
stood and the Jews fell into their hands. There were killed the sons
of Lapidus, Markus and Aron; his daughter. Bluma; Chana, Zina and
Chaja Sara Lapidus, and Freida Lida were wounded. The house was
wrecked. An old man (Frejtkin); together with a woman, fled.
They
were caught by the hooligans and killed. A student of the commercial
school, Disszig, endeavored to defend Lapidus, but he was killed.
(4) On Saturday. June 16, the baker, Gershel,
and the tailor, Markel, were carrying bread to those Jews who were
hiding in cellars and were starving. When
passing through the
Piaskowa Street they encountered several policemen, the chief of
whom, Ramontowicz, fired on them. Gershel was wounded and Markel
was killed.
On Friday, June 15, in the
Kowalska Street, the
hooligans started throwing stones at the house of Judel Tajcman. The
whole family thereupon left the house and went to a relation,
Gindler. An arrangement was made with policeman
No. 40, who accompanied them and promised to protect them. In the
Portchtowa Street they were attacked by a band of hooligans. In his
flight Judel Tajcman fell and was killed. Policeman No. 40 stood by
and looked on with indifference.
(6) When the soldiers were firing In the
street, on Thursday, June 14, a young Jewish boy, a student of the
commercial school, named Gildberg, was ordered away by an officer in
command. As the boy fled the officer ordered one of his men to
"finish" him. Thereupon one of the soldiers struck the boy with the
butt-end of his rifle, and when he fell to the ground he
"finished" him.
(7) On Saturday, June 16, Liba Szlachter,
frightened by the pogrom, took refuge In the garret of Ram's house.
Some other Jews were also hidden there. The next morning soldiers
under the command of a policeman entered and killed Chaim
Szlachter, a little girl, wounded Berak Szlachter and his son, and
drove the rest into the street.
(8) On Thursday, immediately after the
beginning of the pogrom, Zamel Cukerman was working in the house of
his sister, Rywka Boruchowicz. In the front part
of the house was a
small shop. The hooligans attacked this shop and began to plunder
It. Cukerman and Boruchowicz jumped through the window into the
courtyard and ran to the lodging of the Warden, Karpow;
unfortunately they found the door shut. Immediately a policeman
accompanied by soldiers arrived on the scene. The soldiers fired,
Cukerman was killed, and Boruchowicz was dangerously wounded.
Conclusions
It is necessary to arrive at some conclusions about the facts which
have been described. First of all, it is noteworthy to state the
method of the pogrom. The pogrom was known beforehand. The pogrom
was prepared. The rumors about the pogrom were used to frighten the
people. Even the day was appointed. It is therefore clear that the
pogrom was not an accidental occurrence provoked by national or
religious hatred. Considering that the agents of the police
circulated lies about murders committed by Jews, one arrives at the
conclusion that these lies were deliberately and methodically
manufactured according to a settled plan. The preparation of the
pogrom on a day when Christian processions are held, and when the
fanatical mob is usually very much excited, means that an
appropriate moment was selected. It would be easy to understand that
the mob, excited by the supposed
firing by Jews, would make a pogrom and commit atrocities on the
spot of the alleged offense; but it is impossible to imagine that
without preparation a pogrom would have broken out so quickly and in
many places simultaneously. Taking these circumstances into
consideration, one arrives at the conclusion that the pogrom was
previously prepared and organized; but by whom? We find that before
the pogrom the leaders of the Jewish community communicated to M.
Kister, the Governor, that they were in a state of panic concerning
the preparations that were being made. They indicated Sheremetieff
as a person who had appointed even the day for the pogrom, branding
him as an open enemy of the Jewish population. The Governor replied
that Sheremetieff was his most courageous and energetic official.
The pogrom breaks out. The Governor arrives during the day at
Bialystok and stays a long time at the railway station. Afterwards
he drives to the police office
to meet Bogaiewski, and at last he
disappears from Bialystok altogether, and goes to Vilna to the
Governor-General. Driving through the town the Governor sees with
his own eyes the wounded and killed. At the station the hooligans
are murdering the Jews, but the Governor makes no further attempt
to stay the massacre than if he were a powerless civilian. One must
suppose either that the Governor knew of
the approaching
pogrom, and, when it began, took no steps to quell it because the
pogrom was ordered and necessary, or somebody had secretly taken
away from the Governor the power to act in the matter.
One must also remark that when, on June 2, the
members of the Imperial Duma, Jacobsohn and Sheftel, presented to
the Minister of the Interior a petition to stop the pogrom, the
Minister declared that he would wire immediately to order that vigorous measures should be taken. Nevertheless, many Jews were
killed from June 2, at five o'clock in the afternoon, till June 3 in
the morning. Where, then, were the so-called measures? Were orders
given and not taken? This idea is too absurd. It was more likely
that at Bialystok it was not considered necessary to pay any heed to
the instructions of the Minister because of the existence of
instructions emanating from a power higher than that of the
Minister--a power which guaranteed immunity and which approved their
criminal actions.
Considering both the conduct of the Governor
and the futility of the Minister's measures, we are forced to the
conviction that the pogrom was directed by some secret power--a
power which may, or may not, be known to the authorities.
As to the local police, at no time did they
take any measures to quell the pogrom. On the contrary, their agents
excited the baser elements of the population by circulating various
rumors of crimes committed by Jews during the Catholic procession.
The police actually participated in the pogrom and in the pillaging. They indicated who were to be slain, and gave instructions for the slaughter. They led the bands of hooligans
during the pillaging of the shops, and they allowed them to commit
every cruelty. Notwithstanding that martial law had not been
proclaimed, the military commanders who took control of local
affairs, placed at the disposal of the police armed soldiers to kill
the unarmed Jews. The Jews offered no resistance. In a state of
panic they hid themselves in their houses, in cellars, in gardens,
and other places.
Having considered all the facts, the Commission
concludes: (1) That there was no hatred of a national, religious, or economic character between the Jews and Christians in Bialystok.
(2) That hostility to the Jews existed only among the police, who
exerted themselves to promote ill-feeling in the army, by accusing
the Jews of taking part in the movement of freedom. ( 3) That the
pogrom was previously planned and prepared by the administration and that the local
population was quite cognizant of such preparation.
(4) That the circumstance by which the pogrom
started was also previously arranged. The administrator predicted
the circumstance, and therefore it could not be regarded as a
spontaneous occurrence provoked by religious or national
fanaticism.
(5) That the military and the civil authorities
showed by their conduct during the pogrom a complete disregard of
all laws as well as the special regulations promulgated on February
20, 1906. Quite systematically peaceful Jewish residents, women and
children, were shot. The shooting was ostensibly directed against
the revolutionaries, but it is not proved that any revolutionary act
took place.
(6) That not alone did the civil and military
authorities refrain from taking any steps to quell the pogrom, but,
assisted by their agents, they themselves killed, outraged, and
pillaged.
(7) That the official communique
as to
the cause of the pogrom, namely, an attack by the
Jews on the
Catholic religious procession, revolutionary acts by Jews, etc., is
entirely without foundation.
Therefore the Commission proposes to the Duma
to address interpellations:--
(1) To the Minister of the Interior: Will he
hold the Governor of Grodno and the officials of Bialystok
responsible for having neglected their official duties and for
having assisted and taken part in the pogrom?
(2) To the Minister for War:
(a)
Is he
aware that. even before martial law was proclaimed in Bialystok, the
military authorities there, disregarding the existing laws, usurped
the functions of the Governor of Grodno and the assistant-chief of
police, and took the local administration into their own hands?
(b)
Whether he is aware that during the pogrom in Bialystok from the
1st (14th) to the 3d (16th) of June, the military detachments
which were in the town were placed at the disposal of the
police for the purpose of killing peaceful citizens, at the order of the
police, and even of private persons?
(c)
Whether the
guilty are to be prosecuted?
At the same time the Commission considered it
their duty to remark that the local population, which was generally
terrified , is now panic-stricken by the introduction of a state of
war. The investigation of all that happened in Bialystok is possible
only on two conditions:
(a)
That all the members
of the local civil and military administration are dismissed or
removed, and
(b)
that the state
of war prevailing in the town is abolished.
For the
Chairman ,
I. G. SCHTSCHEPKIN.
Reporter , M. P.
ARAKANTZEFF. Secretary,
V. R. JACOBSOHN.
Debates in the Duma
The afternoon sitting of the Duma on July 5 was entirely taken up by
the Bialystok pogrom. M. Arakantzeff. reporter of the investigating
committee, spoke for nearly two hours. The galleries were crowded
to suffocation. M. Stolypin, the solitary occupant of the
Ministerial benches, took copious notes. M. Arakantzeff's report
was delivered in quiet, sober language and in a low voice, which
only heightened the thrilling horror of the recital. They had, he
said, the names and addresses of all the witnesses upon whose
evidence the report was based, but many of these names could not,
for obvious reasons, be made public, at least not so long as the
present administration remained at Bialystok, and the city was under
martial law, and until these conditions were changed, he contended,
it was quite impossible for the Government to ascertain the truth
by an official inquiry. M. Arakantzeff supplemented his report by
reading a telegram from doctors at Bialystok certifying that a
bullet had been extracted from a woman who was supposed to have been
struck by a bomb. This finally disposed of the allegations in the
official report that a bomb was thrown at a procession. The only
bomb was thrown in Surash Street, where some hooligans tried to
extend the pogrom, but hurt nobody. This street was notoriously a
terrorist stronghold, yet neither soldiers nor police ventured
thither, and it was unscathed. If reprisals were evoked by
revolutionaries, how was it that Surash
Street was left alone while other streets were pillaged and the
inhabitants massacred? The
official report says that the troops were constantly fired upon by
Jews from windows. What, he asked, were the losses among the troops?
Three wounded--and he had the evidence of an
officer that these men
were shot by their own comrades in a cross-fusillade of a garden.
The official report says that Jewish revolutionaries bombarded the
central police station from a house which was burned. and in which
eight or nine revolutionaries were found killed.
This house could be no other than the dwelling
adjoining the saw-mills. It was physically impossible to fire from
it upon the police station. He had shown in the report the real
circumstances of this unprovoked butchery. Why, he asked, were the
massacres not stopped on the second day, when M. Stolypin claimed to
have sent orders to that effect? The history of the Bialystok
massacre was only a counterpart of the whole infamous policy of
stirring up religious and race hatred, whereby the old regime
hoped to perpetuate its own existence. Finland, Poland, and the
Caucasus were other examples. The authors thereof had not scrupled
to degrade the army to the rank of butchers and to besmirch the revered name of the Emperor. Let the whole world know that the
pogroms were not the work of the Russian nation, but of the
socalled Government of Russia. It had deceived and demoralized the
army into regarding all friends of freedom as enemies of the Czar
and the country, but the army was waking up. It would see through
the imposture, and then woe betide the traducers and foes of the
Russian nation! (Cheers.) The
inhabitants of Bialystok had anchored
their hope of salvation and justice upon the Duma. He would ask the
Duma to honor the memory of the victims by standing up. The whole
House rose in solemn silence and none ventured to cheer.
On July 6 the discussion on the massacres was
opened by Professor Schtschepkin. He pointed out that the Bialystok
pogrom was a social and an historic phenomenon, and must,
therefore, be considered from both aspects. After referring to the
fact that the whole of Western Europe
had eagerly awaited his
report, he explained that the direct cause of the outbreak of the
pogrom could be as little established as that of the fire in Moscow
in 1812. Who had thrown the first bomb, who had fired the first
shot, would never be discovered. He did not believe that anarchists
were responsible. The anarchists would have exactly foreseen the
consequences of such an act, and it was quite out of the question
that they could have been guilty. It was within the range of
possibility that someone not belonging to any revolutionary
organization might have thrown the bomb, but really the bomb did
not enter into the matter at all. For it was not the bomb that
produced the pogrom, but exclusively the attitude of the police. It
was the police that had met the procession, and by their outcry
about the bomb had set it into confusion and excitement. A panic
ensued, and this brought about the subsequent disaster. It was
clear, therefore, that the police had organized the pogrom with
provocative intent. If the police had remained quiet nothing would have happened. As far as the course of the pogrom itself was
concerned, it fully corresponded to the experiments which
have been
conducted in this sphere by the late Prefect of Odessa,
Neidbardt. Where no resistance was offered the pogrom proceeded
without interruption. But where the Jewish Self-Defense intervened
and fired at the mob the military were summoned and drove off the
"rebels." As far as the attitude of the authorities individually was
concerned, Professor Schtschepkin advanced as a proof of his
impartiality the fact that, on the occasion of his visit to
Bialystok, he had asked the police for a guard, which had been
granted to him. He had taken that course not in his own interest,
but, firstly, in order to protect the ten Jewish newspaper
correspondents who accompanied him, and, secondly, to prove the
accuracy of his facts. Nevertheless, he had to make a damaging
indictment against all departments of the administration. The
Governor had been absent on the first day of the pogrom. For that
alone he should be dismissed. But he had done nothing later. What
had happened behind the scenes was probably more damning still. The
behavior of the lower police officials was quite obvious. Even
before the murder of Derkatcheff they had publicly threatened a
pogrom and organized bands. During the riot they had led the mob,
and had loudly called on the military not to stop them. Everywhere
where premises were demolished the police had been present. Where
resistance was offered the police summoned the soldiers to overcome
it. To sum up, the police had not only connived at the pogrom, but
had collaborated in it. As far as the military were concerned, it
could be established that certain officers, notably in the Uglitch
and Vladimir regiments, had conducted an active anti-Semitic
propaganda. Moreover, the responsibility could only be laid at the
doors of the officers. It was true that private soldiers were not
bound to carry out illegal orders. But their sense of right had been
absolutely stunted by the way in which they had been requisitioned
in the repressive and punitive campaigns of recent times. Therefore
the rank and file could not be blamed. Both the civil and military
authorities had deceived the Czar in their reports on the
atrocities. For this purpose they had postulated, firstly, that
race-hatred existed; secondly, that the Jewish Self-Defense was
revolutionary, whereas in reality it was organized from among the
bourgeoisie, and was thoroughly loyal; and thirdly, that all
revolutionaries were Jews. An interpellation must be directed to the
Minister of the Interior. But that should not be the only measure to
be adopted by the Duma. First, as there was no independent court,
the inquiry into the Bialystok massacres should be handed over to
the Duma; secondly the soldiers should be impressed with the fact
that they were not bound to carry out the illegal orders of
officers; thirdly, everyone should be allowed, as in Western Europe,
to carry weapons for self-protection. As long as these three
conditions were not fulfilled outbreaks similar to that at Bialystok
might be repeated at any time. (Loud and prolonged applause.)
The next speaker, Mr. Jacobsohn, spoke with
great emotion, and he was frequently interrupted by loud applause.
He said he had desired to keep silent, as the report of the Duma
commission was eloquent enough. But he had visited the cemetery at
Bialystok and he had seen the mutilated corpses of the victims.
That picture would never fade from his memory, and therefore he was
forced to speak. The Government had acted like a thief that was
wanted by the police, and in order to divert attention from its own
crimes, had pointed to the Jews, crying "Stop thief!" It had
provoked bloodshed and organized bands. Otherwise a pogrom would
have been impossible, for race-hatred only existed in their own
sickly imagination. The Minister of the Interior was either a
criminal or a helpless weakling. The Governor was a brute, who had
passed by wounded unmoved and had had them piled with dead on a
barrow and suffocated. (Cries of "Executioners!"
"Murderers!")
He was a coward, for he had fled to Vilna, where he did not shrink
from breathing the same air as Sheremetieff. They were used to
Russian soldiers running away. (Cheers.) Even the rank and file
fled when the Jews offered resistance. They thus maintained the
traditions of the Russian army. The police had helped to murder and
plunder. He (M. Jacobsohn) did not desire to evoke pity, but to
disclose the truth. But he must relate some incidents which were
particularly characteristic. One was as follows: The Jewish Sabbath
fell during the pogrom. A Jewish family had hidden in their house.
It was so poor that it lacked the bread over which to say the usual
blessing. Suddenly the father noticed the mousetrap. A small
piece of bread was hanging on the hook. He took it off and recited
the blessing. So poor and so pious were the Bialystok Jews! Yet they
were called revolutionaries! A band of soldiers broke into the house
and murdered the whole family. He was convinced that the usual form
of inquiry could not be impartial. He concluded by expressing the
hope that the Russian people as a whole would dissociate themselves
from the horrible events at Bialystok. (Cheers.)
During the resumed debate on the Bialystok
massacre on July 9, Mgr. Ropp, Bishop of Vilna, said that there was
no racial or religious hatred between the various nationalities of
Lithuania. The population of Bialystok was divided into two
camps--one including the police, the army, and the authorities, the
other comprising the remainder of the inhabitants. He ascribed the
pogrom to this deplorable state of affairs. There were, however,
certain subsidiary factors which aggravated the situation. On the
one hand, the Bund, a Socialist and exclusively Jewish
organization, had embittered certain sections of the population by
its despotism and terrorist propaganda; on the other hand, Russian
settlers belonging to the old faith had aided and abetted the
police.
M. Vinaver said that the Jews had Socialist
organizations just as the other nationalities had. He contended that
the massacre was artificially and deliberately provoked by the
representatives of officialdom. M. Stolypin had confessed before the
Duma that a few thousand proclamations had been printed at the
Ministry of the Interior "to stimulate the patriotism of the
troops," The speaker maintained that hundreds and thousands of such
proclamations had come from the Komissaroff printing press. He
produced several copies, and read extracts therefrom, inciting to
the extermination of the Jews and all such "enemies of the State."
M. Roditcheff, comparing the official
communique on the Bialystok pogrom with the evidence collected
by the Duma, came to the conclusion that the Government was still
blindly defiant of all the dictates of humanity and reason, and
would awaken only when too late.
Resolution
On July 20, at the last sitting of the Duma,
the following resolution was adopted:
Having heard the Report of the Commission on the
Bialystok Pogrom, the Duma, in view of the facts that the pogrom
against the peaceful Jewish population arose not through the
indignation of the Christian population against the Jews, but
through the measures adopted by the authorities; that for these acts
not only the local authorities are responsible, but also the Central
Government which authorized an extensive propaganda for the
organization of an attack on a social stratum embarrassing to the
Government and took
part in the pogrom; that the official reports
concealed the truth and clearly sought to justify the murder of
peaceful citizens through agents of the Government; that the
Government, convinced of its impotence to fight the revolution,
seeks to overcome it by acts of cruelty upon peaceful citizens; that
this Government, which systematically persecutes and humiliates the
Jews and imbues the population with the conviction that everything
is permitted against the Jews, resolved to wreak vengeance on the
weakest and most severely persecuted section of the population;
that such mode of action of the Government through the incitement
to pogroms must in future keep the entire population of Russia in a
state of incessant anxiety, and affords no possibility of peaceful
labor; that through the retention in office of the present
irresponsible Ministry the way is paved for frightful anarchy, the
general uprising of the sorely taxed people, and the general ruin of
the land;
Resolves, That
the only remedy for this situation unparalleled in the history of
civilized countries, and the only means to prevent further
pogroms, are to be found in an immediate judicial investigation and
the punishment of all officials, high and subordinate, without
regard to their position,
who were responsible for the pogroms, and
the dismissal of the Ministry.
THE GOVERNMENT OF THE UNITED STATES AND
AFFAIRS OF INTEREST TO THE JEWS, 1905-1906
December 5,
1905,
Hon. Henry M. Goldfogle. of
New York, submits a resolution in the House of Representatives
expressing sympathy with the Jewish sufferers by the Russian
massacres.
December 11,
1905, Hon. William Sulzer,
of New
York, submits a resolution expressing sympathy with the Jewish
sufferers by the Russian massacres.
December 18,
1905,
Hon. William Sulzer, of New
York. delivers a speech on his resolution of December 11.
February 8,
1906, The House Committee on
Foreign Affairs grants a hearing on resolutions expressing the
sympathy of the House with the Jewish victims of the
Russian
massacres.
February 12,
1906, Hon. Charles A. Towne. of
New York, introduces a substitute for the Goldfogle and Sulzer
resolutions of sympathy.
March 19,
1906, Hon. William S. Bennett, of New
York. Introduces a resolution regarding a modification in the
Immigration Law. to meet the case of Russian-Jewish immigrants.
April 2, 1906,
Mr. Henry White, first delegate
of the United States to the Conference on Morocco at Algeciras, has
a provision inserted In the treaty by which the security and equal
privileges of the Jews of Morocco are guaranteed by the
signatories.
April 11,
1906,
Hon. Allan L. McDermott, of New
Jersey, delivers an address in the House of Representatives.
arraigning Russia and other Christian nations for their treatment of
the Jews.
May 23,
1906,
The Senate passes an Immigration
Bill.
June 22,
1906, The Congress passes a Joint
Resolution expressing sympathy with the Jewish sufferers by the
Russian massacres.
June 22, 1906, Hon. John Gill, Jr., of
Maryland, introduces a resolution calling
upon the President to transmit to the House of Representatives such
official Information as he can secure concerning the massacre at
Bialystok.
June 25, 1906, The House passes an Immigration
Bill. June 29, 1906, The Naturalization Bill becomes an Act.
RESOLUTIONS OF SYMPATHY ON ACCOUNT OF
THE MASSACRES OF JEWS IN RUSSIA
As the above list of Congressional resolutions,
etc., shows, four resolutions expressing sympathy with the Jews on
account of the outrages perpetrated upon members of their race in
Russia were submitted to the Congress of the United States.
On February 8, 1906, the House Committee on
Foreign Affairs granted a hearing to those interested in the passage
of the resolutions. The Hon. Simon Wolf, of Washington, D. C., and
Representatives Goldfogle and Sulzer spoke in support of such
resolutions.
On June 22, the following joint resolution was
introduced into the Senate by the Hon. Anselm J. McLaurin, of
Mississippi, and into the House by the Hon. Robert G. Cousins, of
Iowa. It was adopted without debate and unanimously by both Houses,
and approved by the President on June 26, 1906:
Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United
States of America in Congress assembled,
That the people of the
United States are horrified by the reports
of the massacre of
Hebrews In Russia, on account of their race and religion, and that
those bereaved thereby have the hearty
sympathy of the people of this country .
|
|